Skip to content

Comparison between two techniques of endotracheal intubation on blood pressure and heart rate in patient undergoing general anesthesia for elective surgery

Hemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation with Bonfils compared to C-MAC videolaryngoscope: a randomized trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN16349017
Enrollment
50
Registered
2018-03-19
Start date
2014-09-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-09-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

General anesthesia for elective surgery Surgery

Interventions

Participants are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio through a computer generated sequence, to receive intubation with Bonfils or C-MAC. After a standardized induction, intubation is done via the retromo

Sponsors

Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Elective surgery 2. Classified as American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) 1 or 2 2. Aged 18-60 years old.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patient refusal 2. Known Cormack-Lehane grade = 2 3. Known Mallampati > 2 4. Known Patil < 4 cm 5. Mouth opening < 3 cm 6. Active smoking 7. Chronic hypertension.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Hemodynamic response to intubation is measured using heart rate (HR) and arterial blood pressure (systolic, diastolic and mean arterial blood pressure [MAP]) at induction and every minute for the first five minutes post intubation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Duration of intubation (defined as introduction of Bonfils or C-MAC in the oral cavity until confirmation of proper positioning of the endotracheal tube) is measured by a positive capnography reading.

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026