Skip to content

TECAR therapy in the treatment of tennis elbow

An objective and subjective assessment of the effects of TECAR therapy in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN16255747
Enrollment
40
Registered
2020-08-04
Start date
2020-08-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-08-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tennis elbow Musculoskeletal Diseases Tennis elbow, lateral epicondylitis

Interventions

The trial participants will be patients with lateral epicondylitis. They will be randomly divided between comparative groups A and B, which will receive TECAR therapy and sham TECAR therapy, respectiv

Sponsors

Academy of Physical Education in Katowice
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Pain in the lateral epicondyle persisting for =3 months 2. Pain on palpation in the lateral epicondyle 3. A positive Thompson’s test (the patient reports pain when performing resisted extension of a slightly extended wrist, with the fingers clenched into a fist, the elbow extended, and the forearm in a pronated position) 4. A positive Mill’s test (the patient reports pain when performing resisted supination of the forearm with the elbow joint slightly flexed, the forearm in a pronated position, the wrist slightly extended, and the fingers clenched into a fist) 5. Pain during resisted extension of the middle finger 6. Aged 18 to 65 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Local infection 2. Pregnancy 3. Malignancy 4. Bilateral tennis elbow 5. Carpal tunnel syndrome 6. Medial epicondylitis 7. Elbow arthritis or instability 8. Generalized polyarthritis 9. Ipsilateral shoulder dysfunction 10. Neurological abnormalities 11. Radial-nerve entrapment 12. Cardiac arrhythmia or a pacemaker 13. Diabetes 14. Physical therapy and/or a corticosteroid injection administered within the previous six weeks

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. Grip strength in the affected and unaffected upper limbs measured by a SH5001 dynamometer (SAEHAN Corporation) at baseline, 1, 6 and 12 weeks 2. Strength of the wrist extensors in the affected and unaffected upper limbs measured by a SH5001 dynamometer (SAEHAN Corporation) at baseline, 1, 6 and 12 weeks 3. Strength of the wrist flexors in the affected and unaffected upper limbs measured by a SH5001 dynamometer (SAEHAN Corporation) at baseline, 1, 6 and 12 weeks 4. Pain intensity during physical activity measured on the Visual Analog Scale 0-10 (VAS) at baseline, 1, 6 and 12 weeks 5. Pain intensity at rest measured on the Visual Analog Scale 0-10 (VAS) at baseline, 1, 6 and 12 weeks 6. Pain intensity at night measured on the Visual Analog Scale 0-10 (VAS) at baseline, 1, 6 and 12 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Quantitative pain assessment performed with the modified Laitinen’s questionnaire at baseline, 1, 6 and 12 weeks Quantitative pain assessment will be performed pre-treatment and at weeks 1, 6, and 12 post-treatment 2. Pain intensity and difficulty in performing daily activities measured using the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) at baseline, 1, 6 and 12 weeks 3. The extent of disability of the affected upper limb measured using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (DASH) at baseline, 1, 6 and 12 weeks 4. Treatment outcomes assessed based on the Roles and Maudsley score (RMS) at 1, 6, and 12 weeks

Countries

Poland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026