Skip to content

A comparative study between two materials in the promotion of liver growth before liver surgery

Randomized controlled trial comparing preoperative portal vein embolization with polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) particles and coils versus N-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA).

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN16062796
Enrollment
72
Registered
2019-07-05
Start date
2017-11-03
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-08-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Liver cancer Cancer Malignant neoplasm of liver and intrahepatic bile ducts

Interventions

Method of randomization: Randomization Method: RAR The randomize R package of version 1.4 was used for generating the randomization list with the R version 3.4.0. This

Sponsors

Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Central
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Diagnosis of primary or secondary malignant tumours of the liver, documented by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging or biopsy of the tumor lesion 2. Indication for resection of the hepatic tumor 3. An estimated future liver remnant (FLR) less than: 3.1. 25% in healthy liver 3.2. 40% in cirrhotic liver or with severe steatosis or previous chemotherapy 4. Renal function suitable for the use of iodinated venous contrast medium: 4.1. Serum creatinine = 1.4 mg/dL 4.2. Clearance of creatinine (GFR) = 60 mL/min/1.73m2 5. Age = 18 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Uncorrectable coagulopathies 2. Sectorial portal thrombosis (e.g., thrombosis of the right anterior sectorial branch)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Hepatic hypertrophy (liver volume growth) measured by computed tomography volumetry at 14 and 28 days

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Fluoroscopy time (total minutes; e.g. 15 minutes of fluoroscopy), provided automatically by the Angiography machine at the end of each procedure (at the end of Portal Vein Embolization) 2. Contrast volume (millilitres), noted at the end of each procedure (at the end of Portal Vein Embolization) 3. Portal Vein Embolization execution total time (minutes), from the moment the Interventional Radiologist first punctures the liver up to the moment right after removing the liver access sheath 4. Postoperative outcome after liver surgery: this is a composite secondary endpoint: 4.1. Post-operative total hospitalization time (days) from the day of the liver surgery up to hospital discharge 4.2. Length of stay in the intensive care unit (days) from the day of the liver surgery up to intensive care unit discharge 4.3. Use of the "ISGLS" criteria (Rahbari et al Surgery 2011;149(5): 713–724) for liver failure evaluation 4.4. Occurrence of patient death up to 60 days after liver surgery (days) from liver surgery up to 60 days Original secondary outcome measure at submission: In the registry text, the "50-50" criteria was incorrectly attributed as the criteria to evaluate liver failure, being corrected to the "ISGLS" criteria, as in the original protocol (version 1.3).

Countries

Portugal

Contacts

Public ContactJose Hugo Luz
jose.luz@nms.unl.pt+351 (0)932310771

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026