Comparison of three high flow oxygen therapy delivery devices

Comparison of three high flow oxygen therapy delivery devices: a clinical physiological cross-over study

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

ISRCTN

Registry ID

ISRCTN15995925

Enrollment

Registered

2012-09-20

Start date

2009-06-25

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2016-11-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Respiratory failure requiring critical care Respiratory Respiratory failure, not elsewhere classified

Interventions

1. Optiflow™ 2. Boussignac™ 3. Standard facemask with a reservoir bag Airway-pressures and Fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) were measured by a tracheal catheter inserted through the hole of the tra

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Consecutive patients = 18 years old hospitalized in a medical-surgical ICU 2. Planned removal of a tracheotomy tube previously placed in the ICU for weaning from mechanical ventilation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Pregnancy 2. Adult under tutelage 3. Contraindications for non-invasive ventilation, as defined by the last French consensus conference

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Mean airway pressure measured in the trachea	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
1. FiO2 2. Noise intensity 3. Respiratory and auditory discomfort	—

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026