Skip to content

Efficacy and safety of Hydrocortison-POS N1% and 2.5% versus Ficortril 0.5% in the treatment of acute inflammation of the ocular surface or adnexa for which steroid treatment is indicated

Efficacy and safety of Hydrocortison-POS N 1% and 2.5% versus Ficortril 0.5% in the treatment of acute inflammation of the ocular surface or adnexa for which steroid treatment is indicated - a multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, phase III comparison

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN15464650
Enrollment
411
Registered
2013-09-18
Start date
2009-05-20
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2015-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Non-infectious disease of the eye and ocular adnexa, i.e., seasonal or perennial allergic conjunctivitis, acute allergic blepharitis or blepharoconjunctivitis, or allergic lid oedema, with acute inflammation of the ocular surface or adnexa Eye Diseases Blepharoconjunctivitis

Interventions

Patients were randomly allocated to one of three study arms: Arm 1: Hydrocortisone acetate 0.5 % (Ficortril® 0.5%) (n=133 patients) Arm 2: Hydrocortisone acetate 1 % (Hydrocortison-POS® N 1%) (n= 1

Sponsors

URSAPHARM Arzneimittel GmbH (Germany)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Female or male outpatients aged 18 to 75 years old (inclusive) with a non-infectious disease of the eye and ocular adnexa, i.e., seasonal or perennial allergic conjunctivitis, acute allergic blepharitis or blepharoconjunctivitis, or allergic lid oedema, with acute inflammation of the ocular surface or adnexa for which topical steroid treatment is advisable 2. A clinical sum score of signs and symptoms of at least 10 with at least one item scored as ?2? (moderate) or ?3? (severe) at baseline.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Incapability of understanding the language in which the written patient information is given 2. Presence or history of drug or alcohol abuse 3. Presence of any malignancy during the past 5 years 4. The patient is a woman of childbearing potential who does not use a reliable method of contraception 5. The patient is a pregnant or breast feeding woman 6. Participation in a concurrent clinical trial or in another trial within the past 4 weeks 7. Previous participation in this trial or the patient is the investigator him/herself 8. Pre-treatment which is not permitted 9. Concomitant treatment which is not permitted 10. Allergy or hypersensitivity to any ingredients of the trial medication 11. Any contraindication for the use of steroids: e.g. bacterial, some specific viral or fungal eye infections, glaucoma [except open-angle glaucoma with controlled Intraocular pressure (IOP)], cataract (except early-stage cataract), etc. 12. Findings with fluorescein corneal staining at baseline which prohibit steroid treatment 13. Eye discharge (yellowish) with score of 1 or above at baseline as assessed by the investigator 14. Ocular injury and/or ocular surgery within 3 months prior to trial participation (preceding intra ocular laser surgery expressively permitted) 15. Systemic or topical steroids within 1 month prior or during trial participation 16. Contact lenses 17. Changes in eye hygiene measures after study inclusion 18. Any systemic disease which prohibits steroid treatment, e.g. severe osteoporosis, unstable diabetes mellitus, Cushing syndrome, etc.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary and secondary outcomes were measured by standard ophthalmological methods. The ophthalmologist assessed clinical signs and symptom by score values during a slit lamp examination. Additionally visus and intraocular pressure were measured. Patient was also asked to assess the local tolerance by a questionnaire. Ophthalmological slit lamp examination: Time to first occurrence of at least 50% in sum score of signs and symptoms

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Efficacy The three treatment groups were compared pair-wise with regard to the differences in subscores of objective and subjective signs and symptoms between end of treatment and baseline, as well as the differences in time to 50% reduction of objective signs and subjective symptoms, responders and remitters, differences in the scores of single items of the CSS, treatment duration, and global assessments of efficacy. Safety To assess the different outcomes of the three treatments on intra-ocular pressure (IOP), to evaluate tolerability by (relative) frequency of (serious) adverse events, abnormalities of vital signs, visual acuity test and fluorescein corneal staining in the three treatment groups, and to compare global assessment of tolerability between each pair of the three treatment groups 1. Sum score of subjective and objective signs 2. Sum score of objective signs 3. Sum score of subjective symptoms 4. Time to first occurrence of at least 50% reduction in sum score for objective signs 5. Time to first occurrence of at least 50% reduction in sum score for subjective signs 6. Responder (CSS improvement by = 50%) and remitter (CSS=0) rates 7. Treatment duration until CSS=0 8. Global rating of efficacy 9. Intra-ocular pressure 10. Visual acuity 11. Vital signs 12. Fluorescein corneal staining 13. Adverse events 14. Global rating of tolerability Measurements were done at baseline and on day 2, 4, 7, 10, (and if required) 14.

Countries

Ukraine

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026