Skip to content

The effect of anesthetic technique on neonatal morbidity in emergent cesarean section for fetal distress

The effect of anaesthetic technique on neonatal morbidity in emergent caesarean section for fetal distress: a prospective observational study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN15181117
Enrollment
60
Registered
2016-02-15
Start date
2015-07-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-03-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fetal distress and anesthetic technique Pregnancy and Childbirth

Interventions

We are going to observe emergent cesarean sections which are diagnosed as fetal distress. We are not going to intervene regarding the patients anesthetic choice. Regional anesthesia or general anesthe

Sponsors

Suleymaniye Birth And Women's Health Education And Research Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Female 2. Age between 18-45 3. BMI<40 4. Patients diagnosed as being in fetal distress. 5. Patients without neurological diseases 6. Patients consenting to join the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Age less than 18 and older than 45 2. BMI>40 3. Patients that refuse to join study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Neonatal morbidity, measured with APGAR scores in 1st, 3rd, 5th minutes, and umbilical blood gas (if indicated). After the operation we will follow neonates until discharge and record any morbid conditions. We define morbidity as 5-minute Apgar score (APGAR5) <7, any need for mechanical ventilation, any neonatal intensive care unit entrance and any respiratory insufficiency symptoms.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Morbidity of the mother if administering regional anesthesia compared to general anesthesia

Countries

Turkey

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026