Is there a difference in clinical outcome, pain, and range of motion between fixed and mobile bearing Attune total knee replacement?

No difference in clinical outcome, pain, and range of motion between fixed and mobile bearing Attune total knee arthroplasty. A prospective single-center trial.

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

ISRCTN

Registry ID

ISRCTN15117998

Enrollment

100

Registered

2022-04-04

Start date

2015-01-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2022-11-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Comparison between fixed and mobile bearing inserts for Total Knee Arthroplasty in order to draw conclusions regarding clinical benefits Musculoskeletal Diseases

Interventions

All patients either received a fixed or mobile bearing insert during Total Knee Arthroplasty. The decision whether a patient received a mobile or fixed insert was made prior to the surgery based in a

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. End staged-osteoarthritis of the Knee Joint 2. Patients between 50-80 years of age 3. Signed consent to participate in the present study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Secondary Arthritis 2. Varus/Valgus deformities of more than 20° 3. Previous knee surgery except arthroscopy

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Measured at for a minimum of 2 years follow-up. 1. Subjective assessment of success using the WOMAC score 2. Subjective assessment of success using Visual Analogue Scale 3. Range of Motion using the Knee-Society-Score	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
There are no secondary outcome measures	—

Countries

Austria

Contacts

Public ContactPaul Ruckenstuhl

paul.ruckenstuhl@medunigraz.at+43 31638513358

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 12, 2026