Skip to content

Patellar Instability: Physiotherapy or Surgery? (PIPS feasibility trial)

A Feasibility Study into Patellar Instability: Physiotherapy or Surgery (the PIPS feasibility study)

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN14950321
Enrollment
50
Registered
2016-12-22
Start date
2017-01-16
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-07-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patellar instability Musculoskeletal Diseases Patellar instability

Interventions

Participants will be randomly assigned by a computer to either a surgical arm or a non-operative arm consisting of a Personalised Knee Therapy. Personalised Knee Therapy: Participants

Sponsors

University Hospital of Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Provision of written informed consent 2. Aged 16 or over and has closed growth plates on MRI scans (taken as part of standard clinical care) 3. Two or more patella dislocations, OR 1 dislocation with over 6 months of subjective instability leading up to the time of recruitment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients who are unable to adhere to trial procedures or complete questionnaires 2. Previous entry in the present trial (i.e. for the other leg) 3. Patients with another knee condition that results in instability symptoms (ie cruciate ligament rupture, unstable meniscal tear which has not been treated) 4. Past knee surgery (except for simple arthroscopy with or without lateral release, or previous meniscal surgery) 5. Patients with medial dislocations of the patella. This is an exceptionally rare condition but would be treated differently in both arms if it were to occur. 6. Patients with developmental abnormalities of the lower limb requiring complex surgical intervention. This is because the conditions listed below require complex major orthopaedic procedures which may have a different risk-benefit balance to those in the planned study group, but are too rare to be included in the study and analysed separately. These include: 6.1. Severe trochlea dysplasia which (in the opinion of the treating surgeon) requires trochleoplasty 6.2. Rotational, coronal or sagittal mal-alignment of femur or tibia which in the opinion of the treating surgeon requires surgical correction (ie osteotomy) 7. Patients with an osteochondral injury or chondral injury who require surgical treatment. This is an uncommon but recognised complication of patellar dislocation and is treated surgically in the majority of cases

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Norwich Patellar Instability Score (NPIS) at 12 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. The Norwich Patellar Instability Score (NPIS) at baseline, 3 and 6 months. 2. The Banff Patella Instability Index (BPII) at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months. 3. The Kujala score at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months 4. The Oxford Knee Score – Activity and Participation Questionnaire (OKS-APQ) at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months 5. The EuroQol EQ5D (EQ5D-5L) at baseline, 6 weeks and 3, 6 and 12 months

Countries

United Kingdom

Contacts

Public ContactElke Gemperle Mannion
e.gemperle-mannion@warwick.ac.uk+44 2476 151407

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 26, 2026