Skip to content

Methods for evaluating the extent to which different ways of presenting evidence of the effects of health care help people make decisions that are consistent with their own values: a randomised trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN14949974
Enrollment
770
Registered
2007-02-28
Start date
2002-10-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2015-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

N/A Not Applicable N/A

Interventions

Six different summary statistics presenting ten year risk reduction effect of statins on coronary heart disease in the treatment of hypercholesteremia. The methodological aspects reported in this stu

Sponsors

Norwegian Research Council (Norway)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. 18 years old 2. Fluent in English or Norwegian 3. Must give informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Not meeting inclusion requirements

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. Acceptance or rejection of statin treatment 2. Estimated probability to accept or reject statin treatment in relation to value score

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. To investigate the feasibility of conducting Internet-based randomised trials comparing different risk reduction presentations 2. To compare two methods of eliciting values 3. Four ways of weighting the elicited values to calculate a total value 4. To generate hypotheses and calculate sample size for a confirmatory study comparing six summary statistics for communicating evidence of reduced risk of Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) with statin therapy for treatment of high cholesterol

Countries

Norway, United States of America

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026