Skip to content

An assessment of the effectiveness of Psychodynamic Interpersonal Therapy in reducing the repetition of self-harm in adults presenting to an emergency department with acute self-harm (history of 3 or fewer episodes in the last 12 months)

The Self-harm, Assessment, Formulation, Engagement Trial of Psychodynamic Interpersonal Therapy (SAFE-PIT)

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN14748840
Enrollment
770
Registered
2021-11-04
Start date
2022-02-21
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-01-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Self harm Mental and Behavioural Disorders

Interventions

The SafePIT RCT is a 1:1 randomised controlled trial of standard care plus referral to intervention vs standard care alone. A total of 770 participants will be recruited across 12 sites (Mental Health

Sponsors

University of Leeds
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 100 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Aged 18 years or over 2. Registered with a GP in the catchment area of the mental health trust for the duration of the therapy 3. Presenting at ED as a consequence of self-harm, defined as: intentional acts that directly harm a person's own body. This includes methods like cutting, burning, scratching, banging or hitting parts of the body, or interfering with wound healing and it also includes self-poisoning, such as taking overdoses of drugs. 4. Self-harmed 1-2 times in the last 12 months (any amount in their lifetime) OR self-harmed exactly 3 times in the last 12 months but never before this year. 5. Mental capacity to provide fully informed written consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Receiving, or having been referred to, a specific psychological intervention that is similar to the trial intervention, or where a specific intervention is indicated for a related condition (e.g. anorexia nervosa or drug addiction) and would conflict with trial participation. 2. Assessed by clinician as currently unsuitable for therapy (e.g. in crisis; actively suicidal) 3. Lacking capacity to comply with study requirements 4. Insufficient proficiency in English to contribute to the data collection 5. Known risk of violence (for example reported by ED or liaison psychiatry staff) 6. Researcher unable to contact potential participant within 6 weeks following self-harm event

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Time (in months) from randomisation to first repetition of self-harm leading to hospital attendance, obtained from HES data supplemented by clinical record check.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Rate of repetition of self-harm leading to hospital attendance at 6 and 12 months, obtained from HES data supplemented by clinical record check. 2. Time (in months) from randomisation to repetition of self-harm leading to hospital attendance (all events), obtained from HES data supplemented by clinical record check. 3. Rate of repetition of self-reported self-harm at 6 and 12 months, obtained via monthly text message and 6 and 12-month questionnaires. 4. Psychological distress as measured by (CORE-OM) at 6 and 12 months. 5. The proportion of people with clinically significant improvement (and deterioration) on CORE-OM at 6 and 12 months. 6. Anxiety as measured by the Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) at 6 and 12 months. 7. Hopelessness as measured by the Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS) at 6 and 12 months. 8. Interpersonal function measured by the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP-32) at 6 and 12 months. 9. Quality of life as measured by the ReQoL-10 at 6 and 12 months (with comparison to EQ-5D-5L and CORE-6D measures). 10. Health care use, measured by a structured health-resource–use questionnaire and HES data, over 12 months post-randomisation. 11. QALYs based on ReQOL at 6 and 12 months. Internal Pilot Outcome Measure: 1. Recruitment and intervention delivery at 12 months. Qualitative Evaluation Outcome Measures: 1. Thematic analysis of interviews of participants and/or their supporters regarding experience of receiving the therapy. 2. Thematic analysis of interviews of the therapists’ experience of participating in the trial. 3. Logic model of interviews of the service managers and therapists of how the intervention was delivered and the implications for sustaining the intervention in future.

Countries

England, United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026