Skip to content

Comparison of two different wound-care treatments used after dental extractions to identify if healing was improved and pain reduced

Clinical audit of two standard surgical site treatments following dental extractions and the impact on incidence of alveolar osteitis within a specialist dental clinic

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN14642271
Enrollment
934
Registered
2021-11-26
Start date
2000-06-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-08-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Post dental extraction alveolar osteitis Oral Health

Interventions

Use of one of two standard, existing, licensed wound-care treatments at time of dental extraction: sterile water rinse plus corsodyl rinse or socket irrigation with very low level hypochlorite in norm

Sponsors

Specialist Dental Partners Ltd
Lead Sponsor
Hypo-Stream Ltd
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients attending an out-patient dental clinic for non-acute dental extractions.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Does not meet inclusion criteria

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Incidence of alveolar osteitis post-operatively measured using patient records at a single time point

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Satisfactory healing without pain measured using patient records at a single time point

Countries

England, United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026