Skip to content

The effect of infrared heating or traditional moxibustion in osteoarthritis of the knee

The efficacy of moxibustion and infrared laser moxibustion in knee osteoarthritis: A randomized non-inferiority study

Status
Unknown
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN14604492
Enrollment
92
Registered
2021-01-05
Start date
2019-07-15
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-07-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Knee osteoarthritis Musculoskeletal Diseases Osteoarthritis

Interventions

Patients with knee osteoarthritis are randomly allocated into either CO2 laser moxibustion or traditional moxibustion groups. Patients will receive CO2 laser moxibustion or traditiona
at its base is an adhesive membrane. During treatment, the device is placed at an acupoint, and the moxa is burned about 8 mm above the skin. Both groups have 20 minutes of treatment.

Sponsors

Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients aged 50 to 75 undergoing conventional knee osteoarthritis treatment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Knee pain caused by other diseases (such as rheumatoid arthritis, fibromyalgia syndrome, chronic fatigue syndrome, and ankylosing spondylitis) 2. Treatment with steroid drugs in the past 3 months 3. Received acupuncture or moxibustion treatment in the past 3 months 4. Intra-articular injection of hyaluronate in the past 6 months 5. Joint puncture or arthroscopy in the past year 6. Previous (or planned for during the trial) knee or hip replacement surgery 7. Use of other topical treatments for osteoarthritis of the knee 8. Diagnosis of any serious diseases including, but not limited to, heart disease, lung disease, kidney disease, liver disease, malignant tumor, systemic infection, infectious disease, and/or mental illness 9. Participation in another clinical study in the past month

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Knee pain, measured using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain score at baseline and 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Knee function measured using the WOMAC function score at baseline, weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks 2. Knee stiffness measured using the WOMAC stiffness score at baseline, weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks 3.Knee osteoarthritis symptoms measured using the WOMAC total score at baseline, weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks 4. Knee pain measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score at baseline, weeks 2,4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks 5. The 50-yard walking time was assessed and recorded among the participants at baseline, weeks 4 and 12weeks to observe improvements in walking. 6. Quality of life measured using the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) at 4, 12 and 24 weeks and the Quality of Life Scale (QOLS) at 4 weeks 7. Participant perception of the safety of the treatment measured by investigator question (with possible answers of: safe, less safe, safety problem, or serious safety problem) at 4 weeks

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactJing Fang
sxy1@shutcm.edu.cn+86 18816511872

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026