Feasibility and acceptability of the MENTUPP hub: an intervention to improve mental health and wellbeing in the workplace

Feasibility and preliminary efficacy of the MENTUPP hub: an intervention to improve mental health and wellbeing in the workplace

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

ISRCTN

Registry ID

ISRCTN14582090

Enrollment

207

Registered

2021-05-04

Start date

2021-03-22

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-09-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mental and behavioural disorders and wellbeing Mental and Behavioural Disorders

Interventions

This study will evaluate the MENTUPP programme for improving mental health in the workplace. The MENTUPP programme will be delivered through the MENTUPP Hub, an online platform that will deliver psych

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Individuals employed within the selected SMEs 2. Aged 18 years and older 3. Working in the area of health, ICT or construction 4. Employees and/or managers within construction SMEs, including sub-contractors 5. Volunteers for social or human sciences research 6. Able to give informed consent 7. Individuals and groups who may be vulnerable in terms of mental and physical health difficulties

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients 2. Healthy volunteers for medical studies

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
1. Feasibility will be measured throughout the study by tracking using the app: 1.1. Recruitment 1.2. Intervention uptake 1.3. Participant activity on the Hub 1.4. Retention 2. Acceptability will be measured via the app throughout the study: 2.1. Intervention adherence 2.2. Participant satisfaction and feedback and engagement (usability)	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Standardised measures of wellbeing and mental health measured at baseline and post-intervention: 1. Mental wellbeing and quality of life: The World Health Organization – Five Wellbeing Index (WHO-5) 2. Depression and Anxiety: Patient Health Questionnaire Anxiety and Depression Scale (PHQ-ADS; Kroenke et al., 2016) 3. Depression Stigma: Depression Stigma Scale (DSS; Griffiths et al, 2004) 4. Presenteeism in the workplace: Stanford Presenteeism Scale (SPS-6; Koopmann et al., 2002) 5. Productivity: Work Productivity and Activity Impairment – General Health V2.0 (WPAI-GH 2.0; Reilly et al., 2004) 6. Burnout: Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI; Demerouti et al., 2003) 7. Help-seeking behaviour: Attitudes Towards Seeking Professional Psychological Help-Short Form (ATSPPH-SF; Fisher & Farina, 1995). Other secondary outcome measures related to the possible moderations of the MENTUPP effect by the cultural and organisational features of SMEs (OCAI, COPSOQ) 8. Organisational Culture: The Organizational Culture Assessment Instrument (OCAI; Cameron & Quinn, 1999) 9. Psychosocial constructs at the workplace: Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ; National Research Centre for the Working Environment of Copenhagen, 2010)	—

Measure

Time frame

Standardised measures of wellbeing and mental health measured at baseline and post-intervention: 1. Mental wellbeing and quality of life: The World Health Organization – Five Wellbeing Index (WHO-5) 2. Depression and Anxiety: Patient Health Questionnaire Anxiety and Depression Scale (PHQ-ADS; Kroenke et al., 2016) 3. Depression Stigma: Depression Stigma Scale (DSS; Griffiths et al, 2004) 4. Presenteeism in the workplace: Stanford Presenteeism Scale (SPS-6; Koopmann et al., 2002) 5. Productivity: Work Productivity and Activity Impairment – General Health V2.0 (WPAI-GH 2.0; Reilly et al., 2004) 6. Burnout: Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI; Demerouti et al., 2003) 7. Help-seeking behaviour: Attitudes Towards Seeking Professional Psychological Help-Short Form (ATSPPH-SF; Fisher & Farina, 1995). Other secondary outcome measures related to the possible moderations of the MENTUPP effect by the cultural and organisational features of SMEs (OCAI, COPSOQ) 8. Organisational Culture: The Organizational Culture Assessment Instrument (OCAI; Cameron & Quinn, 1999) 9. Psychosocial constructs at the workplace: Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ; National Research Centre for the Working Environment of Copenhagen, 2010)

—

Countries

Albania, Australia, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Kosovo, Netherlands, Spain

Contacts

Public ContactCliodhna O'Connor

cliodhna.oconnor@ucc.ie+353 214205551

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026