PLAN-A: Assessment of whether a peer-led program increases the physical activity of year 9 girls

Conditions

Physical activity Not Specified

Russell Jago, Byron Tibbitts, Kathryn Willis, Emily Sanderson, Rebecca Kandiyali et al. (11 authors)

Public Health Research2022-03-011 citations

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the PLAN-A intervention, a peer led physical activity program for adolescent girls: results of a cluster randomised controlled trial.

Jago R, Tibbitts B, Willis K, Sanderson E, Kandiyali R, Reid T, Kipping RR, Campbell R, MacNeill SJ, Hollingworth W, Sebire SJ.

2021-05-1317 citations

10.1186/s12966-021-01133-8

Protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial of a Peer-Led physical Activity iNtervention for Adolescent girls (PLAN-A)

Kathryn Willis, Byron Tibbitts, Simon J. Sebire, Tom Reid, Stephanie MacNeill et al. (11 authors)

BMC Public Health2019-05-2814 citations

10.1186/s12889-019-7012-x

Interventions

Ten schools are chosen at random to run the peer-training project and ten schools are comparison schools and do not do the peer-training. 1. Peer-nomination: Peer-supporters are identified by peer no

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

Female

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Year 9 girls in participating schools

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: No participant exclusion criteria

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Accelerometer determined mean minutes of Weekday MVPA at T1 (baseline + 1 year)	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
1. Accelerometer determined mean minutes of Weekend MVPA at T1 (baseline + 1 year) 2. Accelerometer determined mean minutes of Weekday sedentary time at T1 (baseline + 1 year) 3. Accelerometer determined mean minutes of Weekend sedentary time at T1 (baseline + 1 year) 4. Cost-effectiveness of the PLAN-A intervention from a public-sector perspective	—

Countries

England, United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed