Skip to content

Surgery of failing dental implants using two different brands of bovine bone chips

The regenerative surgical treatment of intra-bony peri-implantitis defects with Endobon® (test) versus an established bovine derived bone mineral (control) – a pilot study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN14347002
Enrollment
40
Registered
2020-02-20
Start date
2015-07-29
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-09-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Peri-implantitis Oral Health

Interventions

Test patients are treated with Endobon® Xenograft Granules using a "non-submerged" regenerative surgical approach according to the specified procedure, and control patients treated similarly with an e

Sponsors

Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. During surgical exploration an intra-bony component of at least 3 mm at the deepest point must be present. 2. The defect should have a minimum of 3 osseous walls (a circumference of the osseous defect of at least 270 degrees). Only 3 and 4 wall intraosseous defects will be included 3. The defect must not be wider than 4 mm and the defect angle must be less than 35 degrees from axis of implant Note: If the same patient has more than one defect meeting the inclusion criteria only one such defect will be included in the study and the other defects will be treated with standard open flap debridement

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Diabetes mellitus (HbAlc = 6.5%) 2. Taking corticosteroids or other anti-inflammatory prescription drug 3. Taking medications known to induce gingival hyperplasia 4. Allergic to penicillin or metronidazole 5. History of taking systemic antibiotics in the preceding month 6. Pregnant or lactating 7. Stability of the Endobon® granules or control granules cannot be accomplished in the defect 8. Failure of obtaining soft tissue closure 9. Mobile implants

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Vertical radiographic bone fill of peri-implant intra-bony defects measured on the basis of standardized intraoral periapical radiographs at at baseline, 6 months and 12 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
All measured at 6 sites/implant at baseline, 6 months and 12 months: 1. Pocket probing depth 2. Bleeding on probing 3. Dichotomous scoring of suppuration (pus) 4. Dichotomous scoring of plaque

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026