Skip to content

Evaluation of autoSCORE: an artificial intelligence based algorithm for EEG classification versus human experts

Accuracy of EEG classification by autoSCORE algorithm compared with human experts

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN14307038
Enrollment
100
Registered
2022-03-25
Start date
2021-06-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-09-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patients suspected of epilepsy or other conditions with impaired consciousness or cognition Nervous System Diseases Epilepsy

Interventions

EEGs will be automatically assessed by the previously developed autoSCORE algorithm using pre-defined detection thresholds. The algorithm first distinguishes between normal and abnormal recordings. Th

Sponsors

Holberg EEG AS
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The EEGs to be selected for this study have not been part of the training dataset to develop the autoSCORE. The datasets are distributed between the EEGs arriving from Haukeland University Hospital, Danish Epilepsy Centre Filadelfia and Mayo Clinic. Although there is no scientific reason to consider that ethnicities or geographical origin of the EEG, nor the software used for acquisition influences the results, in order to avoid any such potential bias, the study design has addressed this by using EEGs from different geographies. Age range: 35% under 16 years (pediatric population), 65% over 16 years (adult population).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Neonatal 2. EEGs reported with rhythmic and periodic patterns in critically ill patients

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value of autoSCORE compared with the majority-consensus scoring of the human experts, calculated using a balanced sample of 100 randomly selected EEGs at a single timepoint

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Calculated using a balanced sample of 100 randomly selected EEGs at a single timepoint: 1. Inter-test agreement (autoSCORE vs human experts) in the large, independent dataset 2. Performance of autoSCORE at identifying recordings with epileptiform abnormalities (both focal and generalized) compared with the commercially available spike-detector software packages

Countries

Denmark, Norway, United States of America

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026