Skip to content

Effectiveness of stepped care guided self-help followed by face-to-face cognitive behavioral therapy versus standalone internet-delivered or face-to-face cognitive behavioral therapy for depression

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of stepped care guided self-help followed by face-to-face cognitive behavioral therapy versus standalone internet-delivered or face-to-face cognitive behavioral therapy for depression: a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial of the finnish first-line therapies –initiative

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN14296278
Enrollment
948
Registered
2024-09-18
Start date
2024-09-16
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-09-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Treatment and prevention of depression symptoms in mental health services Mental and Behavioural Disorders

Interventions

Participants will be randomized in the following three treatment arms (1:1:1): 1. Stepped care model: guided self-help (GSH, average number of sessions 3) followed by face-to-face cognitive behaviora
=10 p on the PHQ-9) and by research location. The duration of treatments in the study arms are as follows: 1. Sequential treatment of guided self-help and face-to-face CBT (stepped care): approximate

Sponsors

Helsinki University Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Minimum age of 16 years 2. Suitable for step 1-2 treatments (guided self-help, iCBT or CBT intervention) for depression in the first assessment 3. PHQ-9 =5

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Serious suicidal thoughts, plans or any self-harming act or suicidal attempt within the past 2 months 2. Ongoing other psychological treatment for depression and/or anxiety 3. Cognitive impairment 4. Inability to speak, read and write Finnish 5. Currently symptomatic psychotic illness or bipolar disorder 6. Drug or alcohol dependence

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Within-individual change in depression symptoms measured by the PHQ-9. The PHQ-9 is administered weekly from the beginning of the intervention for 16 weeks and at follow-up time points (e.g. 4, 6, 8, and 12 months as well as 2, 5, 10, 15 and 20 years) to enable ITT (intention to treat) -analysis and modeling the symptom change in time.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Psychotropic medication use is measured using participant self-report at T0, T3, T4, T5, and all optional follow-ups 2. Employment status is measured using participant self-report at T0, T3, T4, T5, and all optional follow-ups 3. Income in the previous year is measured using participant self-report at T0, T5, and all optional follow-ups 4. Alcohol use is measured using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption (AUDIT-C/AUDIT) at T0, T3, T4, T5, and all optional follow-ups 5. Healthcare visits over the previous 12 months are measured using participant self-report at T0, T5, and all optional follow-ups 6. Severity of anxiety symptoms is measured using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) at T2, T3, T4, T5, and all optional follow-ups and weekly from the beginning of the intervention for 16 weeks 7. Subjective work ability is measured using participant self-report at T0, T2, T3, T4, T5, and all optional follow-ups 8. Perceived social support is measured using the Perceived Social Support Scale-Revised (PSSS-R) at T0, T3, T4, T5, and all optional follow-ups 9. Functional impairment is measured using the Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS) at T0, T3, T4, T5, and all optional follow-ups 10. Quality of life is measured using the EQ-5D-5L and Euro Health Interview Survey (Euro-HIS) at T0, T3, T4, T5, and all optional follow-ups 11. The number of intervention sessions attended is measured using participant records at T2 12. Patient experience of the intervention is measured using participant self-report at T2 13. Direct and indirect healthcare, social care, employment, and societal costs are measured using Finnish national registries at T0, T3, T4, T5, and all optional follow-ups These outcome measures, combined with data from Finnish national registries, will provide a comprehensive overview of the effectiveness and cost-efficiency of the treatments being studied.

Countries

Finland

Contacts

Public ContactKatariina Mattila
katariina.m.mattila@hus.fi+358 94711

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026