Skip to content

Stenting of venous sinus stenosis for medically refractory idiopathic intracranial hypertension

Stenting of venous sinus stenosis for medically refractory idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a cohort study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN13784335
Enrollment
33
Registered
2015-08-13
Start date
2011-09-20
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-01-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension Nervous System Diseases Benign intracranial hypertension

Interventions

Endovascular venous sinus stenting.

Sponsors

CHU de Québec
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients aged 18 and over with diagnosis of IIH according to Friedman diagnostic criteria for whom standard medical treatment has failed (defined as persistent headaches or visual symptoms or papilloedema in spite of 3 months treatment with Diamox or intolerance of side effect of the medication) 2.Venous imaging (CT, MR or standard venography) showing bilateral transverse sinus stenoses or unilateral transverse sinus stenosis with contralateral transverse sinus atresia. At least one of the stenosis must cause >50% reduction of the sinus lumen. 3. Pressure gradient across the stenosis >8 mmHg 4. Signed informed consent obtained from the patient

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Allergic reaction to iodine contrast despite premedication 2. Contraindication to general anaesthesia 3. Contraindication to aspirin, Clopidogrel (Plavix®) or anticoagulants 4. Patient with medical history of intracranial venous thrombosis (which do not correspond to idiopathic intracranial hypertension and increase risk of venous stent thrombosis) 5. Pregnant women

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
CSF pressure normalisation at 6 months follow up. CSF pressure will be measured by lumbar puncture at the start of the trial and 6 months after the stenting. A normalisation is defined as at least a 15 mmHg difference between pre- and post-op lumbar puncture.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Significant decrease in CSF pressure at 6 months 2. Improvement of visual fields, visual acuity, vision color, visual evoked potential at 3 months and 12 months 3. Improvement of papilloedema (according to Frisén scale) at 3 months and absence of papilloedema at 12 months, with improvement of OCT 4. Resolution of visual complaints (transient visual losses, visual obscurations, poor vision, blurring of vision etc.) at 12 months 5. Decrease of headaches score (HIT-6) and severity at 12 months 6. Improvement in Quality of Life at 12 months 7. 12 months stent patency on CT-Venous angiogram 8. Safety and treatment side effects immediately after intervention and at 1 month (evaluated in neurology), and modified Rankin scale immediately after intervention and at 1 month.

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 26, 2026