Skip to content

Comparing the efficacy of video-based learning with real patient interactions versus traditional teaching on dental students' education

Comparative efficacy of video-based case learning with patient-clinician interactions versus traditional teaching methods on educational outcomes among dental students: a multi-level randomized controlled trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN13665080
Enrollment
300
Registered
2025-01-27
Start date
2026-04-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-02-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Knowledge acquisition, skill development, and attitude change among dental students Oral Health

Interventions

This parallel-group randomised controlled trial will have two arms: an intervention group and a control group. The intervention group will engage in video-based case learning using pre-recorded patien

Sponsors

Egas Moniz School of Health and Science
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Currently enrolled in a recognized dental program (Bachelor’s or Master's level) 2. Have completed at least one semester of dental training 3. Willing to engage with video-based case learning and participate in both the intervention and assessment phases of the study 4. Able to understand and complete assessments in English or Portuguese 5. Have access to a computer and stable internet connection to engage with the online learning platform and complete digital assessments 6. No history of significant cognitive or neurological conditions that might affect learning ability 7. Provide written informed consent to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Participants who are not currently enrolled in a recognized dental program 2. Participants who have not completed at least one year of dental training 3. Participants who are under 18 or over 65 years old 4. Participants who have a history of significant cognitive or neurological conditions that may affect learning ability 5. Participants who are unable to understand and complete assessments in English (or the relevant language of the study) 6. Participants without access to a computer or stable internet connection for engaging with the online learning platform 7. Participants who have not provided written informed consent to participate in the study 8. Participants with any significant visual or hearing impairments that may affect their ability to engage with video-based learning 9. Participants who have previously participated in similar interventions or studies that may create bias in the outcomes 10. Participants who are not willing to engage with video-based case learning or participate in the assessment phases of the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. Knowledge acquisition is measured using an assessment questionnaire at baseline, immediately post-intervention, 6 months, and 1 year post-intervention 2. Skill development is measured using the Global Rating Scale (GRS), administered at baseline, immediately post-intervention, 6 months, and 1 year post-intervention 3. Attitude change is measured using the Professional Assessment Scale (PAS) at baseline, immediately post-intervention, 6 months, and 1 year post-intervention These outcomes will be assessed at each specified time point to evaluate both the immediate and long-term impact of the intervention.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Anxiety is measured using the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-21) at baseline, immediately post-intervention, 6 months, and 1 year post-intervention. 2. Stress is measured using the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-21) at baseline, immediately post-intervention, 6 months, and 1 year post-intervention. 3. Student engagement is measured using a self-reported engagement survey, with Likert-scale items, at baseline, immediately post-intervention, 6 months, and 1 year post-intervention. 4. Perceived confidence in clinical skills is measured using a self-assessment questionnaire at baseline, immediately post-intervention, 6 months, and 1 year post-intervention. 5. Satisfaction with the e-learning platform is measured using a Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Likert-scale survey at baseline and immediately post-intervention. 6. Perceived ease of use is measured using a Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Likert-scale survey at baseline, midpoint, and immediately post-intervention. 7. Perceived usefulness of the e-learning platform is measured using a Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Likert-scale survey at baseline and immediately post-intervention. 8. Usefulness is measured using a Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Likert-scale survey at baseline and immediately post-intervention. 9. Digital skills are measured using the DigComp framework (v 2.2), with assessments at baseline, immediately post-intervention, 6 months and 1 year post-intervention.

Countries

Portugal

Contacts

Public ContactMariana Morgado
mmorgado@egasmoniz.edu.pt+351 (0)916562014

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026