Skip to content

Comparing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of robotic assisted total hip replacement to conventional total hip replacement in the management of adults with osteoarthritis of the hip

Robotic Arthroplasty: a Clinical and cost Effectiveness Randomised controlled trial for Hips

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN13374625
Enrollment
378
Registered
2021-05-07
Start date
2021-10-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-10-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adults with osteoarthritis of the hip joint for which, in the opinion of the treating clinician, warrants a total hip replacement. Musculoskeletal Diseases Hip osteoarthritis

Interventions

Conventional total hip replacement and robotic-assisted total hip replacement, using the Mako Robotic system (Stryker, USA) Randomisation will be completed using a secure online web system and will b

Sponsors

University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust
Lead Sponsor
University of Warwick
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Osteoarthritis of the hip with pain, disability and radiological changes that, in the opinion of the treating clinician, warrants a total hip replacement 2. Conservative therapy has been unsuccessful, as judged by the treating clinician

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Osteoarthritis due to inflammatory arthropathy or intra-articular fracture, as judged by the treating clinician 2. Revision surgery or need for complex implants, or any other implant than a standard hybrid construct (Trident Exeter) or uncemented construct (Trident Accolade), as determined by the treating clinician. This includes nickel-free implants as well as those that require a long stem, augments, or custom made devices 3. Age < 18 years 4. Unfit for THR, or surgery is otherwise contra-indicated, for example, concurrent infection 5. Previous randomisation in the present trial, i.e. the other hip 6. Unable to take part or adhere to trial processes including prisoners or people unable to communicate or complete questionnaires in English, or people unable to give informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Joint awareness measured using the Forgotten Joint Score Hip-12 (FJS-12) at 12 months post-surgery

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Peri-operative outcomes: 1. Mean pain intensity, using an 11-point numerical rating scale for "pain right now" and "pain since yesterday" on the morning of each of the first three days following surgery and at baseline 2. Estimated blood loss calculated using Brecher's formula, based on pre- and post-operative Haematocrit measurements from routinely collected clinical blood measurements, and volume, if any, of blood transfused 3. Opioid use to the end of day three measured using patient records 4. Hours from surgery to hospital discharge measured using patient records Outcomes collected at baseline, three and six months and one, two, five and ten years post-operation: 1. Overall hip pain and function measured using FJS-12 2. Overall hip pain and function measured using Oxford Hip Score 3. Health utility measured using EQ-5D-5L (also collected at 6 weeks) 4. Satisfaction with total hip replacement, measured using a five-point Likert scale 5. Resource use using patient questionnaires 6. Re-operations Process and Fidelity measures: 1. Time from skin incision to final dressing measured using patient records 2. Alignment measures at three months on a focused low-dose CT: rotation of femoral and acetabular components, leg length and offset compared to pre-operative plan Safety outcomes: 1. Adverse events relating to the operation, the anaesthetic or rehabilitation measured using patient records

Countries

England, United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 8, 2026