Skip to content

SPECIAL: Standard or Palliative Care in Advanced Lung Cancer - Does early referral of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer to UK specialist palliative care services make a difference in their quality of life or survival?

A phase III randomised trial, with integral feasibility stage, to assess changes in quality of life and survival in patients being referred for early than versus standard specialist palliative care on being diagnosed with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN13337289
Enrollment
585
Registered
2015-06-17
Start date
2015-09-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-09-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stage IV non-small cell lung cancer

Interventions

Feasibility study : All patients will be asked to complete a Sheffield Profile for Assessment and Referral for Care (SPARC) holistic needs questionnaire (a copy of the last form comple

Sponsors

Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients : 1. Any adult (=18 years) patient with newly diagnosed stage IV non-small cell lung cancer, with histologically confirmed diagnosis 2. ECOG performance score 0-3 Carers: Must be caring for a patient participant of the trial. NB. A patient's involvement in the trial is not dependent upon having a carer willing and able to take part also.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. ECOG performance score 4 2. Prognosis of =2 weeks 3. Participation in another local competing supportive or palliative care trial 4. Dementia, delirium or other lack of capacity or communication which renders the patient unable to participate in the trial 5. Any other psychological disorder which, in the view of the investigator, renders the patient unable to participate 6. Unable to communicate in English or with the use of an interpreter

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Feasibility study : 1. The number of potentially eligible patients and the proportion consenting to registration in the three participating centres, and to evaluate adequate acceptance rate for patient willingness to be randomised 2. Patient pathway planning and scoping for Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) adaptation 3. Feasibility of using quality of life (QoL) and resource use questionnaires To inform design for large scale RCT. Randomised trial: To compare the two treatment arms in terms of the two co-primary outcome measures: 1. Global Health Status Score (GHSS) at 3 months after trial entry 2. Quality-adjusted survival time (QAS) over 6 months (also referred to as Quality Adjusted Life Years [QALY])

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Randomised trial: 1. Overall survival: defined as the time from randomisation to death (due to any cause) or to date last seen for those not known to have died 2. Anxiety/depression: as measured using the patient-completed HADS questionnaire at baseline, 3 and 6 months 3. Pain: as measured using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and –LC13 questionnaires at baseline and subsequent monthly (or three-weekly, treatment regime dependent) clinic visits 4. Health Economics, Cost-effectiveness and Resource Use: 4.1. Number of days spent in hospital/hospice: obtained from patient records. Duration defined as time from admission to discharge 4.2. Use, or not, of medical interventions in last month of life: details to be collected from patient records. The patient subgroup will be defined as those for which death was observed 4.3. Intensive Therapy Unit (ITU) admission: the number of patients admitted, the frequency of duration of visits will be obtained from patient records. Duration is defined as the time from admission to discharge from ITU 4.4. Use of Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR): obtained from patient records 5. Quality of life: to be assessed using EQ-5D-5L and EORTC QLQ-C30, -LC13 and –BM22 questionnaires at baseline and subsequent monthly (or three-weekly, treatment regime dependent) clinic visits 6. Memory and cognitive ability: will be assessed for consenting participants using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) at baseline, 3 and 6 months 7. Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS): will be assessed from blood albumin and CRP results at baseline, 3 and 6 months Secondary outcomes pertaining to family care-givers include: 1. Health Survey: assessment using the SF-12® at baseline and subsequent visits to the clinic corresponding with the patient participant’s vis

Countries

England, Scotland, United Kingdom

Contacts

Public ContactAnn Pope
SPECIAL@trials.bham.ac.uk+44 (0)121 414 6372

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026