Skip to content

The effects of different community fitness centre based interventions in sedentary adults

The effects of 48 week structured exercise, unstructured exercise, physical activity counselling, or measurement only control on strength and body composition in sedentary adults

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN13024854
Enrollment
2080
Registered
2018-03-05
Start date
2013-08-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2019-03-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Physical activity and exercise Not Applicable

Interventions

The population (P) was sedentary adults. The interventions (I) included two fitness centre interventions and a physical activity counselling intervention both described below, and the comparator (C) w
a structured exercise programme (STRUC), or free/unstructured exercise (FREE). Those choosing a non-fitness centre pathway were randomised to either physical activity counselling (PAC), or to a measur

Sponsors

University of Greenwich
Lead Sponsor
ukactive
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Sedentary, defined as currently not meeting the physical activity recommendations of the UK Chief Medical Officer 2. Taking no medication that might impact cardiovascular risk

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Not classified as sedentary 2. Currently taking medication that might impact cardiovascular disease risk

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Measured pre and post (48 weeks) intervention: 1. Body composition, including BF mass (kg), LBM (kg) and BF percentage (%), measured using bioelectrical-impedance (Bodystat 1500, Bodystat, Isle of Man, UK). Guidelines from the National Institute of Health Research Southampton Biomedical Research Centre were followed for body compositions assessment (http://www.uhs.nhs.uk/Media/Southampton-Clinical-Research/Procedures/BRCProcedures/Procedure-for-bioimpedance-with-Bodystat-1500.pdf). 2. Predicted 1RM for chest press, pull down and leg press obtained by gauging the maximal weight that could be lifted successfully for between 5 and 15 repetitions, and inputting these data into the Brzycki equation (i.e. weight/(1.0278-(0.0278 x No. Repetitions)). These results were collapsed into a single strength measure (the mean of the predicted 1RM for each exercise).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Measured pre and post (48 weeks) intervention: 1. Maximal aerobic capacity (VO2max) predicted using the Modified Balke Protocol. Participants walked on a treadmill at between 3.6 and 5.6 kph, depending on ability, for 3 min. Following this, the gradient was increased by 1% each minute. Ratings of perceived exertions were recorded at 1 min intervals using the OMNI1–10 scale. Oxygen consumption and heart rate were continuously monitored via direct gaseous analysis (Fitmate Pro, COSMED, Italy). Predicted VO2max was automatically extrapolated using the relationship with heart rate. The test was terminated when participants indicated perceived exertion above six (hard) and/or their heart rate reached 150 bpm. 2. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), which describes the average arterial pressure during a single cardiac cycle, incorporating both systolic and diastolic phases, but weighted towards the diastolic. Systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressures (mmHg) were measured using a commercially available blood pressure monitor (Omron Healthcare, Japan). Three readings were collected and the mean value reported. MAP was estimated via the calculation MAP=DBP+0.33(SBP-DBP). 3. Total cholesterol (TC: the sum of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol) measured via finger-prick blood analysis (Cholestech LDX, Alere, UK)

Countries

United Kingdom

Contacts

Public ContactSteven Mann

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026