Skip to content

Comparing the outcomes and complications of protected and unprotected penetrating keratoplasty in treating chronic pseudophakic corneal edema

“Open sky” penetrating keratoplasty versus simultaneous penetrating and lamellar keratoplasty for pseudophakic bullous keratopathy

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN13006963
Enrollment
50
Registered
2023-08-02
Start date
2018-03-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-08-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patients with a diagnosis of irreversible pseudophakic chronic corneal edema who required penetrating corneal transplantation due to failure to improve with other medical treatments Eye Diseases

Interventions

Participants in this study undergo either an unprotected or protected partial penetrating keratoplasty to treat chronic pseudophakic corneal edema. Upon enrolment, patient data is gathered from medic

Sponsors

Universidad de Ciencias Médicas de la Habana
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients operated on for cataracts who developed chronic corneal edema resistant to medical treatment in an eye with some visual possibility 2. Written informed consent to participate in the research

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Refusal of the patient to undergo another surgical treatment or not having the possibility of vision

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. Visual acuity assessed using the Snellen E chart at baseline (preoperative), immediately postoperative, and at the follow-up visits scheduled weekly for the first 2 months, then every 2 months until completion of 1 year. 2. Endothelial cell count of the donor pre and post transplants is measured using specular microscopy (Topcon SP-3000P) at baseline (preoperative) and 1 year postoperative.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Intraocular pressure is measured using a pneumatonometer preoperatively and postoperatively at each follow-up visit scheduled weekly for the first 2 months, then every 2 months until completion of 1 year. 2. Condition of the transplant, transparency, status of sutures, and tolerance to medication, evaluated by anterior segment biomicroscopy at each follow-up visit scheduled weekly for the first 2 months, then every 2 months until completion of 1 year. 3. Any intraoperative, immediate, and late complications are recorded and managed appropriately. The complications are evaluated at each follow-up visit scheduled weekly for the first 2 months, then every 2 months until completion of 1 year. 4. Postoperative medication tolerance evaluated by the patient's reported symptoms and by clinical evaluation during each follow-up visit scheduled weekly for the first 2 months, then every 2 months until the completion of 1 year. 5. Quality of life assessed using an NEI VFG-25 scale covering aspects like vision-related daily life activities, discomfort, and overall satisfaction with the treatment at baseline and at 1 year postoperative.

Countries

Cuba

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026