Skip to content

Digital trauma handover

Digital decision support to reduce time to treatment in trauma

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN12983121
Enrollment
60
Registered
2025-05-20
Start date
2025-05-21
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-03-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Traumatic injury Injury, Occupational Diseases, Poisoning

Interventions

The study comprises a mixed methodology approach with five components: 1. Clinical risk perception questionnaire 2. Clinician usability questionnaire 3. Semi-structured clinician interview 4. Quantita

Sponsors

Queen Mary University of London
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
16 Years to 100 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Trauma clinicians: Consultant, Specialist Registrar (resident), or paramedics who have direct involvement in initial assessment, management of adult trauma patients transported by London's Air Ambulance to the Royal London Hospital. 2. Trauma patients: Aged 16 years or over with traumatic injury

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Trauma clinicians: 1. Consent: clincians who decline to consent or participate 2. Involvement: clinicians not involved in the initial care of adult trauma patients Trauma patients: 1. Aged under 16 years 2. Presenting with injuries: burns, hangings, drownings, or acute psychotic episodes without physical injuries

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. Usability measured by the System Usability Scale score and the PAAS Mental Effort Scale at each trauma team activation 2. Perceived usefulness and acceptability based on a semi-structured interview at 2-monthly intervals (beginning, middle, and end of study)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Clinician risk perception: clinicians’ estimates of patient risks will be measured using a 0-100% probability scale immediately post-resuscitation 2. Clinician risk perception performance: clinician risk estimates will be compared to documented (true) patient outcomes to assess accuracy 3. The patient risks and outcomes that will be measured are: 3.1. In-hospital mortality 3.2. Trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC), defined as an admission Prothrombin Time ratio (PTr) >1.2 3.3. Significant haemorrhage (=4 units of blood transfused within 4 hours post-injury) The patient outcome data used for comparisons are standard clinical indicators routinely collected during trauma care. This study will not involve any additional data collection directly from patients. Instead, it will utilise retrospective data analysis of existing clinical records to determine the accuracy of clinicians' risk assessments.

Countries

England, United Kingdom

Contacts

Public ContactZane Perkins
z.perkins@qmul.ac.uk+44 (0)2073777000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 20, 2026