Skip to content

Sonic Sleeve: investigating whether music feedback can help reduce compensatory movements in stroke rehabilitation patients with paralysis affecting one side of the body

Sonic Sleeve: reducing compensatory movements in stroke rehabilitation with the aid of auditory feedback

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN12969079
Enrollment
45
Registered
2019-05-03
Start date
2019-05-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-03-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Paralysis affecting one side of the body in stroke patients. Nervous System Diseases Hemiplegia

Interventions

Participants who are able to complete the whole study will require four separate sessions that will take around 2 hours 45 minutes over the first few weeks of participants three-week stay on the Upper

Sponsors

Goldsmiths University of London
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Acceptance on the Upper Limb Neurorehabilitation Service at the National Hospital For Neurology and Neurosurgery. 2. Diagnosis of stroke resulting in hemiparesis at least 6 months prior to study. 3. Cognitive ability to follow the tasks. 4. Ability to lift the affected hand onto a table whilst seated, unaided by their unaffected limb. 5. Ability to sit unsupported for at least 10 minutes. 6. Aged between18-75. 7. Inefficiency in their movement pattern that can be tracked by the machine learning system in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: High level of functioning in the upper limb (i.e. with little or no further improvement possible)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary dependent variable is a compensation percentage change score. The relative score for each movement will be calculated as (time in optimum movement - time in error movement) / time in optimum movement * 100. This means a lower percentage score signals less time spent in undesirable compensatory movement. The scores will be collected in milliseconds at all time points in the study over four separate sessions with data taken from the custom made system called Sonic Sleeve.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. The total number of repetitions are measured to track how many times the patient reaches the target X and back. The measure will be taken at all time points over four separate sessions with data taken from the custom made system called Sonic Sleeve that gives the start pose and end position of each target movement. 2. The number of quality repetitions is determined by counting the number of repetitions with no compensatory movements and is worked out by referring to the primary outcome data. If no compensatory movement is detected above a noise threshold then repetitions will be added as a quality repetition. 3. Fatigue is measured using the Likert scale post-session in all four sessions. After each session patients will answer the Likert scale question: How tiring did you find taking part in this session? [Not at all, a little, rather, very, extremely]. This will help to keep track of how tired they feel and may help understand differences in the data.

Countries

England, United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 12, 2026