Skip to content

Future men’s boys development programme. A randomised controlled trial efficacy study

Efficacy study randomised control trial evaluation of future men’s boys’ development programme for boys at risk of disengagement and exclusion which aims to improve school engagement

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN12897947
Enrollment
480
Registered
2024-07-26
Start date
2023-09-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-08-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Developing the social and emotional capacity and skills of boys in Years 7-11 who are at risk of exclusion and disengagement from schools, to improve school engagement and reduce the likelihood of exclusion. Mental and Behavioural Disorders

Interventions

This efficacy study will be a two-arm, parallel-group-assignment randomised control trial (RCT). Randomisation will be done at the individual level with stratification at the school level. Randomisati

Sponsors

Youth Endowment Fund
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Male

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Boys aged 11-16 years old 2. Boys at risk of exclusion (due to poor behaviour records and/or significant behaviour incidents). This is assessed by incidents of poor behaviour in individual behaviour logs, for example, incidents in the classroom, around the school and/or situations involving teachers and/or other pupils 3. Boys at risk of disengagement (achieving below potential and/or poor attendance). This is assessed by school attendance which is recorded accurately each day for pupils. 4. Boys at risk of poor outcomes due to known adversity outside school (child-poverty, previous or ongoing child-protection concerns). This is assessed by socio-economic information collected by schools such as being eligible for Free School Meals, care status, or having English as an additional language.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Boys’ behaviour and circumstances indicate that clinical support would be more appropriate. (For example, where there is evidence of significant trauma for which no prior support has been received.) 2. There is evidence that the school intends to exclude the boy and is using the programme to demonstrate that support was offered. 3. The boy has a more advanced learning or communication need which would make a speaking and listening intervention hard to access. However, young people with SEND or an EHCP are not automatically excluded from the programme.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
School engagement measured using the School Connectedness Questionnaire at baseline and 12 and 24 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The following secondary outcome measures are assessed at baseline and 12 and 24 weeks, unless otherwise stated: 1. Relationships with peers measured using the Strengths and Difficulties peer-relationship problems subscale 2. Emotional symptoms measured using the Strengths and Difficulties emotional symptoms subscale 3. Behavioural difficulties measured using the Strengths and Difficulties externalising behaviours score 4. Relationships with teachers measured using the School Connectedness Teacher Bonding and Attachment subscale 5. Relationship between project co-ordinator and young person measured using the Social Support and Rejection Scale at 12 and 24 weeks

Countries

England, United Kingdom

Contacts

Public ContactEmma Andersen
emmaandersen@Cordisbright.co.uk+44 (0)20 7330 9170

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026