3D printing and planning for orbital floor (bottom part of the eye socket) fractures

3D printing and planning for surgery of orbital floor fractures in adult patients to improve patient related outcome. A comparison with retrospective patients group with orbital floor fracture reconstruction without 3D printing and planning

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

ISRCTN

Registry ID

ISRCTN12793225

Enrollment

Registered

2023-03-14

Start date

2022-03-09

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-07-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

3D printing and planning for orbital floor fractures Musculoskeletal Diseases

Interventions

All consecutive adult patients with isolated orbital floor fracture were included in the study. CT scan before and after surgery. 3D printing and planning before surgery + pre bended implant (printed

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. All consecutive adult patients with isolated orbital floor fracture, who were treated in P. Stradins Clinical University hospital from 01/01/2022 2. Residents of Latvia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Non residents of Latvia, e.g. refugees 2. Additional facial fractures e.g. zygomatic bone fractures 3. Poor quality CT scan 4. Missing CT scan 5. Not attended control visits 6. Mentally disabled patients 7. Children

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Orbital volume changes were measured before and after repairment and compared with intact orbit. Measurements was preformed using 3D slicer image Computing Platform for the Quantitative Image Network	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Clinical diplopia evaluation after 1 week, after 2 months, and after 6 months (if persistent) using a questionnaire with a visual analogue scale	—

Countries

Latvia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 23, 2026