Dental caries Oral Health
Conditions
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: 1. Healthy pediatric patients aged 7-9 years old 2. Pediatric patients were classified as either definitely positive or positive based on Frankel’s behavior rating scale 3. Radiographically, lesions reaching the middle or inner third of the dentine (D2/3) were observed in immature mandibular PFMs 4. Caries lesions fell under ICDAS code 4
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: 1. Special health care needs for pediatric patients 2. Immature mandibular PFMs were exhibiting pulpal and/or periodontal issues 3. Unintentional pulp exposure occurred during the excavation process 4. Immature mandibular PFMs with dental anomalies
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The efficacy of caries removal was measured by two blinded examiners (ICC > 0.8) using the Ericson et al. scale by visual-tactile examination and utilizing the caries detector of the Ericson et al. scale after caries excavation | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| 1. Objective pain assessment measured using the Sound, Eye, Motor (SEM) scale by two blinded examiners (ICC > 0.8), and SEM scoring criteria during the excavation of caries 2. Subjective pain assessment measured using the Wong-Baker FACES scale during caries excavation 3. Requirement of local anesthesia measured using data collected in the study records during caries excavation | — |
Countries
Syria