Skip to content

Using robot-assisted training to support action sequencing and autonomy in children with neurodevelopmental conditions

Enhancing adaptive behavior in children with autism through robot-guided action sequencing: the RONIN proof-of-concept study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN12712593
Enrollment
60
Registered
2025-11-06
Start date
2024-09-18
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-11-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) Mental and Behavioural Disorders

Interventions

The study evaluates the effectiveness of a robot-assisted behavioral intervention aimed at improving action sequencing skills in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). The intervention is compa

Sponsors

Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
6 Years to 15 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Children aged 6 to 15 years at the time of enrollment 2. Formal diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) confirmed through standardized tools: 2.1. Autism Diagnostic Interview–Revised (ADI-R) 2.2. Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule – Second Edition (ADOS-2) 3. Sufficient receptive language and cognitive ability to understand and follow task instructions 4. Regular attendance at the participating clinical center(s) 5. Parental or legal guardian consent obtained, with age-appropriate assent from the child 6. Inclusive of all genders, ethnicities, and socioeconomic backgrounds 7. Not currently enrolled in any conflicting experimental therapy programs

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Presence of severe intellectual disability that would prevent meaningful engagement with the training protocol 2. Significant behavioral disturbances (e.g., severe aggression, self-injury) that could interfere with participation or safety 3. Uncorrected sensory impairments (e.g., vision or hearing problems) that would limit interaction with the robot or materials 4. Diagnosed neurological or medical conditions not related to ASD that may confound outcomes 5. Ongoing participation in other experimental or non-standardized interventions 6. Irregular attendance at the clinical center, preventing completion of the training protocol or assessments 7. Inability to obtain informed consent from a parent or legal guardian

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Action sequencing and adaptive functioning: 1. Theory of Mind, facial affect recognition, and contextual understanding of social interactions, assessed using NEPSY-II – Social Perception Subscale 2. Ability to comprehend, recall, and execute sequential actions in both cognitive and practical domains, assessed using Batteria per la Valutazione della Sequenzialità Cognitiva e Operativa (BVSCO) 3. Practical, social, and conceptual skills essential for daily functioning and autonomy in real-life contexts, assessed using the Adaptive Behavior Assessment System (ABAS) Assessment Timeline: T0 (Baseline) – Before any intervention T1 (Midpoint) – After the first phase (training or control) T2 (Post-crossover) – After the second phase Blinding: All assessments are conducted by clinicians blind to the intervention phase of the participant to reduce bias. Scoring and Interpretation: Improvement is quantified through pre-post differences across all three tools, focusing on gains in social cognition, sequencing ability, and adaptive functioning. Statistical comparisons are made across and within groups (crossover design).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Clinician feedback via focus groups: structured focus groups were conducted with clinical professionals at three key time points during the study: 17 July 2024, 15 January 2025, and 21 May 2025. These sessions served as both a participatory research method and a tool to assess the clinical relevance, usability, and perceived effectiveness of the robot-assisted intervention. Assessment Focus: 1. Observed changes in children's autonomy and behavior in clinical settings 2. Perceived generalization of training effects to daily life 3. Suggestions for improving training protocols and personalization 4. Practical feasibility of long-term implementation Analysis Method: Qualitative content analysis of transcribed focus group discussions, coded for themes such as engagement, skill transfer, adaptability, and clinical utility. Purpose: These qualitative insights support the interpretation of quantitative outcomes and guide the iterative development of the RONIN intervention for future clinical trials.

Countries

Italy

Contacts

Public ContactAgnieszka Wykowska
agnieszka.wykowska@iit.it+39 (0)10 8172242

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026