Skip to content

CONTEST Study - Accuracy of contrast enhanced breast tomosynthesis: A comparison with digital mammography and breast MRI

CONTEST study: CONTrast Enhanced breaSt Tomosynthesis (CONTEST) in patients suspected of having breast cancer: a prospective comparison with digital mammography and breast MRI

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN12691785
Enrollment
200
Registered
2018-02-12
Start date
2018-05-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cancer Cancer Breast cancer

Interventions

All participants receive the equivalent of standard care, a Digital Mammogram (DM) and the experimental procedure which is the Contrast Enhanced Digital Breast Tomosythesis (CE-DBT). Needle biopsy is

Sponsors

University of Dundee and NHS Tayside
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female
Age
18 Years to 70 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Age 18 to 70 years inclusive 2. Female 3. Able to give informed consent 4. Clinical examination findings suspicious or typical of operable breast cancer (E4/5) AND/OR 5. Ultrasound findings suspicious or typical of malignancy (U4/5) 6. Able to give informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. History of prior iodinated contrast reaction 2. Iodine allergy 3. Severe asthma 4. Known renal impairment, strong risk factors for renal disease 5. Previous breast cancer surgery or implants 6. Current pregnancy, lactation 7. Inflammatory or clinically obvious locally advanced (inoperable) primary breast cancer who are likely to receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy (in these patients, imaging/pathological correlation will not be possible) 8. Contraindication to MRI 9. Obvious severe comorbidities precluding operative treatment 10. Otherwise deemed to be unsuitable by the clinical team

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Sensitivity of CE-DBT compared with DM using surgical pathology as the gold standard.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Correlation of tumour size measurements with CE-DBT compared to MRI, using surgical pathology as the gold standard 2. Identification of multifocality with CE-DBT compared to MRI, using surgical pathology as the gold standard 3. Patient perspectives on the CE-DBT procedure is measured using a questionnaire after the procedure 4. Patient perspectives on the MRI scan is measured using a questionnaire after the procedure

Countries

England, Scotland, United Kingdom, Wales

Contacts

Public ContactKulsam Ali
k.z.ali@dundee.ac.uk+44(0)1382 383967

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026