A peer-led physical activity intervention for adolescent girls

Conditions

Physical activity Not Applicable

Sebire SJ, Banfield K, Jago R, Edwards MJ, Campbell R, Kipping R, Blair PS, Kadir B, Garfield K, Matthews J, Lyons RA, Hollingworth W.

2019-09-0222 citations

10.1186/s12889-019-7545-z

A peer-led physical activity intervention in schools for adolescent girls: a feasibility RCT

Simon J. Sebire, Kathryn Banfield, Rona Campbell, M. J. Edwards, Ruth Kipping et al. (12 authors)

Public Health Research2019-09-015 citations

10.3310/phr07160

Results of a feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial of a peer-led school-based intervention to increase the physical activity of adolescent girls (PLAN-A).

Sebire SJ, Jago R, Banfield K, Edwards MJ, Campbell R, Kipping R, Blair PS, Kadir B, Garfield K, Matthews J, Lyons RA, Hollingworth W.

2018-06-0748 citations

10.1186/s12966-018-0682-4

Update to a protocol for a feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial of a peer-led school-based intervention to increase the physical activity of adolescent girls (PLAN-A).

Sebire SJ, Edwards MJ, Campbell R, Jago R, Kipping R, Banfield K, Kadir B, Garfield K, Lyons RA, Blair PS, Hollingworth W.

2016-12-014 citations

10.1186/s40814-016-0110-y

Protocol for a feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial of a peer-led school-based intervention to increase the physical activity of adolescent girls (PLAN-A).

Sebire SJ, Edwards MJ, Campbell R, Jago R, Kipping R, Banfield K, Tomkinson K, Garfield K, Lyons RA, Simon J, Blair PS, Hollingworth W.

2016-01-1517 citations

10.1186/s40814-015-0045-8

Interventions

Four schools will be chosen at random to run the peer-training project and two schools will be comparison schools and will not do the peer-training. 1. Peer-nomination: Peer-supporters will be ident

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

Female

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Year 8 girls in participating schools

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: No participant exclusion criteria

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
1. Recruitment and retention rates of peer-supporters and non-peer supporter Year 8 girls (measured between September 2015 - March 2016, approximately) 2. Data provision rates, in order to estimate questionnaire and accelerometer provision rates for a full trial (measured between September 2015 and November 2016) 3. Acceptability of the training and intervention to stakeholders (peer-supporters, pupils, parents, peer-educators and schools) (measured post-intervention, between March-May 2016, approximately) 4. Feasibility of gathering the permissions needed to conduct data linkage to long-term outcomes (between September 2015-December 2017) 5. Feasibility of collecting information needed to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of the intervention (measured throughout the intervention period, approximately January-April 2016)	—

Measure

Time frame

1. Recruitment and retention rates of peer-supporters and non-peer supporter Year 8 girls (measured between September 2015 - March 2016, approximately) 2. Data provision rates, in order to estimate questionnaire and accelerometer provision rates for a full trial (measured between September 2015 and November 2016) 3. Acceptability of the training and intervention to stakeholders (peer-supporters, pupils, parents, peer-educators and schools) (measured post-intervention, between March-May 2016, approximately) 4. Feasibility of gathering the permissions needed to conduct data linkage to long-term outcomes (between September 2015-December 2017) 5. Feasibility of collecting information needed to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of the intervention (measured throughout the intervention period, approximately January-April 2016)

—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
1. Accelerometer-determined daily minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. This is the likely primary outcome in a definitive trial 2. Self-reported mode of travel to school (active vs passive) 3. Self-reported leisure-based sedentary behaviour 4. Self-esteem, health-related quality of life and potential mediators of the intervention (such as self-determined physical activity motivation and peer-norms) will be assessed All secondary outcomes will be measured at three time points: September 2016 - November 2015; March-April 2016; September-November 2016	—

Measure

Time frame

1. Accelerometer-determined daily minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. This is the likely primary outcome in a definitive trial 2. Self-reported mode of travel to school (active vs passive) 3. Self-reported leisure-based sedentary behaviour 4. Self-esteem, health-related quality of life and potential mediators of the intervention (such as self-determined physical activity motivation and peer-norms) will be assessed All secondary outcomes will be measured at three time points: September 2016 - November 2015; March-April 2016; September-November 2016

—

Countries

England, United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed