Skip to content

Comparing the accuracy of Intraoral scanning (IOS) versus stereophotogrammetry (SPG) for impressions of dental implants for toothless patients

Intraoral scanning (IOS) versus stereophotogrammetry (SPG) for complete-arch implant impression: A prospective in vivo study on 15 edentulous jaws

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN12501259
Enrollment
15
Registered
2021-10-13
Start date
2021-03-29
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-10-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Implant-supported complete arch restorations of edentulous jaw Oral Health Edentulous jaw

Interventions

The recruited patients of our study received a full-arch implant supported rehabilitation by means of a screw-retained fixed prosthesis in the last 3 years. After the Ethical Committee approval we sca

Sponsors

University of Rome Tor Vergata
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Healthy patients aged =18 years 2. Full mouth bleeding and full mouth plaque index lower than or equal to 25% 3. Bone height for at least 10 mm long implants 4. Bone width of at least 5 mm and 6 mm for narrow (NP 3.75/3.5 mm) and regular (RP 4.3 mm) implants, respectively 5. Fresh extraction sockets with an intact buccal wall 6. At least 4 and 5 mm of bone beyond the root apex in the mandible and maxilla 7. Minimal insertion torque of 45 Ncm

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. General medical (American Society of Anesthesiologists, ASA, class III or IV) and/or psychiatric contraindications 2. Pregnancy and/or breastfeeding 3. Any interfering medication such as steroid therapy or bisphosphonate therapy 4. Alcohol and/or drug abuse 5. Heavy smoking (>10 cigarettes/day) 6. Radiation therapy to head or neck region within 5 years 7. Untreated periodontitis 8. Acute and chronic infections of the adjacent tissues or natural dentition 9. Severe maxillomandibular skeletal discrepancy 10. High and moderate parafunctional activity 11. Absence of opposite teeth

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Accuracy measured by analyzing linear and angular deviations between each test scan and the reference scan using a dedicated measurement software (Hyper Cad S, Cam HyperMill, Open Mind Technologies, Milano, Italy)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The effect of stereophotogrammetry versus IOS, adjusting for possible confounding factors, will be measured using the General Linear Model at multivariate analysis

Countries

Italy

Contacts

Public ContactPaolo Carosi
Paolo.carosi@alumni.uniroma2.eu+39 3277998699

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026