Skip to content

Comparing the treatment of deciduous teeth in children with the Er:YAG laser to the traditional method

A randomized and split-mouth clinical trial conducted to compare the treatment of deciduous teeth in children with the Er:YAG laser to the traditional method

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN12447217
Enrollment
47
Registered
2024-07-20
Start date
2021-11-25
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-07-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Treatment of carious lesions of primary teeth in children using lasers Oral Health

Interventions

The randomized clinical split-mouth trial involved 66 teeth with deep caries in 33 subjects (female and male
age: 3–8 years). Each tooth on the test side (n=33) of the maxilla or mandible was treated with the Er:YAG laser, while the teeth on the opposite side (n=33) served as a control group (conventional tr

Sponsors

Wroclaw Medical University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Children who had visited a dental office for the first time in their lives for a dental examination and possible conservative treatment 2. The patients in the study were healthy children who were not taking any medication 3. They also did not report any pain when coming to the office 4. The patients were aged between 3 and 8 years 5. The patients exhibited unicuspidal deciduous teeth with deep caries

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Does not meet inclusion criteria

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. Pulp reaction to treatment. The Pulp Vitality Tester was employed to assess dental pulp vitality. The device quantifies pulp vitality on a scale of 0 to 80 µA (0–40 µA – vital pulp; 40–80 µA – pulpitis; over 80 µA – necrotic pulp). The pulp responses of deciduous teeth were studied using both traditional and laser methods following the treatment 2. The working time for conventional and laser method for each method was recorded using a stopwatch 3. Following the conventional and laser treatment visit, patients were asked to rate their pain sensations using emoticons according to the VAS scale

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
There are no secondary outcome measures

Countries

Poland

Contacts

Public ContactJacek Kotula
j_kotula@poczta.onet.pl+48 698680831

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026