Skip to content

Re-prioritising health in urban development decision-making to prevent non-communicable disease

TRUUD: Tackling Root Causes Upstream of Unhealthy Urban Development

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN12310546
Enrollment
200
Registered
2021-03-30
Start date
2020-04-20
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-09-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Public Health Other

Interventions

Participants will be interviewed and/or invited to take part in focus groups/workshops. They will be asked about the decision-making systems for urban developments. For participants in focus groups/w

Sponsors

University of Bristol
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Professionals in the field of urban development with influence: 1.1. Formal position 1.2. Part of the process in which relevant decisions are being made 1.3. Causation/ centrality to the decision making process upstream 2. Individuals who have an understanding of the system

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Individuals deemed to be mid- or downstream actors

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Interviews and focus groups/workshops conducted at 3 time points over 5 years will be used to gather data in 3 phases: Phase One: 1. Systems map providing detail on the system of decision making by actors who operate upstream 2. Key areas for intervention in this system, using a qualitative multi-method design including participant co-production 3. Contextual factors of importance in case studies, using a participant-observer approach Phase Two: 4. Set of interventions, designed specifically for intervention points identified in Phase One, using a qualitative multi-method design including participant co-production 5. Efficacy of interventions, using qualitative multi-method design including participant co-production Phase Three: 6. Revised interventions, using qualitative multi-method design including participant co-production 7. Efficacy of interventions in short term, using qualitative multi-method design including participant co-production

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
There are no secondary outcome measures.

Countries

England, Scotland, United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026