Augmented reality in undergraduate surgical teaching Surgery
Conditions
Interventions
Method of randomization: block randomization
Control arm: current national undergraduate university curriculum
Intervention arm: additional teaching comprising three virtual surgeries through the Pro
Sponsors
Royal College of Surgeons of England
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Final-year medical students in the UK
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Students who are not final-year medical students in the UK
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Student performance in Short Based Answer (SBA) questions using MRCS-based Part A questions, measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and post-intervention. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| 1. Student perception and confidence measured using a five-point Likert score at baseline (pre-intervention) and post-intervention 2. Cost-benefit analysis. The cost-benefit of the intervention will be assessed compared to traditional surgical teaching. The cost-benefit analysis will be conducted after the intervention is completed. | — |
Countries
England, United Kingdom
Outcome results
None listed