Skip to content

General versus specific spinal manipulation for back pain

A randomised controlled trial comparing targeted thrust manipulation with a general manipulation thrust in low back pain: Is a general approach as effective as specific?

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN11994230
Enrollment
76
Registered
2017-04-12
Start date
2005-06-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2019-11-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lower back pain Injury, Occupational Diseases, Poisoning Lower back pain

Interventions

Participants are randomly allocated to one of two groups. Randomisation is done through minimisation using BMI and gender as variables. Participants receive three sessions that are spaced seven to ni

Sponsors

University of Manchester
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Adults aged 18 to 60 with low back pain 2. Roland Morris Pain and Disability Questionnaire (RM) score of 4 or more at the initial examination 3. Symptoms for at least 3 weeks

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Frank spinal deformity 2. Lumbosacral anomalies 3. Neoplastic disease of skeletal or soft tissue of the spine 4. Bone disease e.g. Paget’s disease, osteoporosis, osteomyelitis 5. Inflammatory arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis 6. Gout 7. Cord signs: signs of a upper motor neuron lesion at the spinal cord level 8. Positive Lhermitte’s sign: This is where on flexion of the neck tingling or shock like sensations run down the arms to the fingers or down the legs and is a sign of a lesion in the posterior columns of the cervical cord (Draper, 1985). 9. Cervical and thoracic joint conditions producing neurological symptoms in one or both lower limbs 10. Evidence of involvement of one or more spinal nerve root 11. Cauda equina syndrome- triad of low back and or leg pain, numbness in the sacral region and loss of bladder or bowel control (Draper, 1985). 12. Advanced diabetes when tissue vitality might be low 13. Vascular abnormalities, visceral arterial disease 14. Congenital generalised hypermobility Ehlers-Danlos syndrome 15. Advanced degenerative changes 16. Severe root pain 17. Undiagnosed pain 18. Painful joint conditions, psychologically reinforced where manipulation runs the risk of producing an obsessional neurosis of vertebral displacement. 19. Warfarin sodium anticoagulant medication. 20. Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Pain is measured using the Visual Analogue Scale for pain experienced at baseline and after session one, two and three.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Self-reported disability is measured using Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire at baseline and after session one, two and three 2. Pressure pain threshold is measured using a manual algometry pressure on the spinal muscles at baseline and after session one, two and three 3. Muscular reflexogenic responses (peak EMG amplitude) are measured using surface electromyography at session one, two and three

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 20, 2026