Skip to content

Effectiveness of brief psychotherapy in the treatment of common mental disorders in public mental health centers

Effectiveness of brief psychotherapy in the treatment of common mental disorders in public mental health centers in comparison with habitual treatment: a clinical randomized trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN11895027
Enrollment
200
Registered
2020-11-03
Start date
2005-02-11
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-11-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Psychological and psychopharmacologic interventions in adult patients with common mental disorders (mainly depressive and anxiety disorders) Mental and Behavioural Disorders

Interventions

285 patients attending six Mental Health Centers for the first time are randomly assigned to two treatment groups, 148 to the experimental group and 137 to the control group. A brief

Sponsors

Unidad de Coordinación de salud mental del Principado de Asturias (Mental Health Coordination Unit of the Healthcare Services of the Principality of Asturias)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The sample is randomly selected from among the people referred from primary care to six mental health centers of the public health services of the Principality of Asturias: 1. Over 18 years old 2. Go to that CSM for the first time 3. Diagnosed according to ICD-10 of depressive or anxiety disorders 4. Attend at least at one consultation with the therapist 5. Agree to participate in the research

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Diagnosed according to ICD-10 criteria of organic mental disorder, psychosis, addictions, eating disorder, mental retardation, psychological development disorder or serious personality disorder (Paranoid, Schizoid, Disocial and Emotional Instability) 2. Have made a serious suicide attempt in the previous 6 months 3. No required specialized care (those cases that do not require treatment are excluded)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The result or dependent variables (more than 20) are recorded at each timepoint of follow-up. They analyze the clinical-administrative result, the clinical and disability status, treatment in Primary Care, work situation, consumption of psychotropic drugs, satisfaction, etc. The fundamentals and the measurement instruments used are described below: 1. Clinical-administrative results: describes the status of the patient regarding treatment at the Mental Health center and consists of the following categories: Continues treatment, Discharge (the patient has been discharged by his/her reference therapist), Abandonment (the patient interrupts treatment against the opinion of the therapist or without having consulted him), Return and Others. Measured at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after the start of treatment. 2. Clinical status according to the patient evaluated using three scales at 6, 12 and 24 months after the start of treatment. In the second phase it is measured also before the start of treatment: 2.1. Severity scale of the Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-G) 2.2. Scale of change or improvement of the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) 2.3. Symptom Check List-90 (SCL-90-R). Three global indices are obtained: Global Severity Index (GSI), Total Positive Symptoms (PST) and Positive Distress Index (PSDI). 3. Degree of disability according to the patient assessed using the Sheehan Disability Inventory at 6, 12 and 24 months after the start of treatment. In the second phase it is also measured before the start of treatment 4. Consumption of psychotropic drugs: only antidepressant drugs and benzodiazepines are analyzed because the consumption of other psychotropic drugs is minimal. The amounts have been standardized according to the equivalence of each medication with the reference drug in each group (equivalence in milligrams of imipramine in t

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Patient satisfaction with the treatment evaluated using the Satisfaction Questionnaire by Moré and Muñoz (2000) at the end of the treatment

Countries

Spain

Contacts

Public ContactMarco Antonio Luengo Castro
marco.luengo@sespa.es+34 (0)985 30 11 66

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026