Facilitating Implementation of Research Evidence

Conditions

Long-term nursing care Not Applicable Nursing care

Rycroft-Malone J, Seers K, Eldh AC, Cox K, Crichton N, Harvey G, Hawkes C, Kitson A, McCormack B, McMullan C, Mockford C, Niessen T, Slater P, Titchen A, van der Zijpp T, Wallin L.

2018-11-1678 citations

10.1186/s13012-018-0811-0

Facilitating Implementation of Research Evidence (FIRE): an international cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate two models of facilitation informed by the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS) framework.

Seers K, Rycroft-Malone J, Cox K, Crichton N, Edwards RT, Eldh AC, Estabrooks CA, Harvey G, Hawkes C, Jones C, Kitson A, McCormack B, McMullan C, Mockford C, Niessen T, Slater P, Titchen A, van der Zijpp T, Wallin L.

2018-11-1657 citations

10.1186/s13012-018-0831-9

FIRE (Facilitating Implementation of Research Evidence): a study protocol.

Seers K, Cox K, Crichton NJ, Edwards RT, Eldh AC, Estabrooks CA, Harvey G, Hawkes C, Kitson A, Linck P, McCarthy G, McCormack B, Mockford C, Rycroft-Malone J, Titchen A, Wallin L.

2012-03-2758 citations

10.1186/1748-5908-7-25

Interventions

Arm 1: guidelines on continence care and an implementation guide (control) Arm 2: guidelines on continence care and an implementation guide and type A facilitation (a 12-month developm

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Long-term nursing care settings with at least 60 places 2. Publically funded places 3. Residents who are aged 60 years or older 4. Interested in taking part in the study 5. Residents with documented urinary incontinence 6. Participants within each site will include those who have consented to be involved as: 6.1. Facilitators engaged in intervention delivery 6.2. Staff at all levels working in sites delivering care 6.3. Key stakeholders related to sites (e.g. regional administrators, funding agencies) 6.4. Residents and carers

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with moderate or severe dementia

Design outcomes

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Clinical outcomes including: 1. Quality of life 2. Continence status 3. Pad use 4. Health economic analysis Follow up of outcome data is at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after the interventions starts in all arms. Process data is also collected thoughout the study.	—

Primary

Measure	Time frame
The extent to which the guidelines are implemented, using clear criteria linked to the guidelines. Follow up of outcome data is at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after the interventions starts in all arms. Process data is also collected thoughout the study.	—

Countries

Ireland, Netherlands, Sweden, United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed