Skip to content

Comparing two local anaesthetic drugs in treatment of children's teeth

Comparative studies of the anaesthetic efficacy of 4% Articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine used as mandibular infiltration versus 2% Lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine used as inferior dental nerve block, in extraction and restoration of mandibular primary molars

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN11415977
Enrollment
110
Registered
2012-10-12
Start date
2013-01-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-10-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental caries Oral Health Dental caries

Interventions

We will randomly assign the subjects into 2 groups
one group (Treatment group) will receive mandibular infiltration with 4% articaine with 1:100,000 and the other group (Control group) will receive inferior alveolar nerve block with 2% lidocaine with

Sponsors

University of Leeds (UK)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Children aged 5 to 9 years 2. Medically fit 3. Requiring extraction /restoration of primary mandibular molars teeth under local anaesthetic 4. Understand English 5. Mentally capable of communication 6. Tooth has no history of infection (abscess) or swelling and no evidence of periapical pathosis 7. The roots resorption of the primary tooth must be less than half of the root 8. Parents/guardian must give informed written consent prior to participation 9. Child must give assent form prior to participation, as well as parental consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Medically and mentally compromised children 2. History of significant behaviour management problems 3. Evidence of infection near the proposed injection site as this might affect the efficacy of local anaesthesia 4. Child does not speak English

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Successful completion of treatment

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Child perception of the treatment using specific questionnaire developed by the researcher 2. Parent perception of the treatment using specific questionnaire developed by the researcher

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026