Improving the sustainability and healthiness of diets Nutritional, Metabolic, Endocrine
Conditions
Interventions
Worksites are randomised according to matched-pairs randomisation (based on mean sales) to either ecolabel or control (no label) conditions. In the ecolabel condition, labels indicating the relative e
Sponsors
University of Oxford
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Recruitment is conducted at the worksite-level. We will recruit GB-based worksites that: 1. Have electronic point-of-sale tills 2. Are catered by our foodservice partner 3. Are able to provide data at a detailed enough level to identify specific meals sold
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Not meeting the inclusion criteria
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Environmental impact of purchases: Measured by the mean environmental impact score for purchased products across a week in each worksite cafeteria. The outcome will be calculated from sales data recorded via electronic point-of-sale tills throughout the 12 weeks of the trial, combined with data on the environmental impact of each food option. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| 1. Impact on revenue: Measured by the total weekly revenue (£GBP) from each cafeteria, based on sales data recorded via electronic point-of-sale tills throughout the 12 weeks of the trial 2. Impact on transactions: Measured by the total number of transactions per week in each cafeteria, based on sales data recorded via electronic point-of-sale tills throughout the 12 weeks of the trial 3. Health impact: Measured by total energy (kcal) purchased weekly in each worksite cafeteria (controlling for the total number of transactions), calculated from sales data recorded via electronic point-of-sale tills throughout the 12 weeks of the trial, combined with data on the energy content of each food option | — |
Countries
England, United Kingdom
Outcome results
None listed