Preliminary evaluation of a structured support program (Transition) for young adults with housing support

Feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of the Transition program as an add-on to support as usual for young adults in Sweden with housing support: a non-randomised mixed methods feasibility study

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

ISRCTN

Registry ID

ISRCTN11055465

Enrollment

Registered

2022-10-05

Start date

2022-10-10

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-09-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Quality of life, mental health, self-efficacy and functioning in young adults who are recipients of housing support. Other

Interventions

This feasibility study will employ a single-arm design, where all included participants will be offered the Transition program as an add-on to housing support as usual. Housing support is a form of pr

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Aged 18 to 29 years 2. Currently accessing housing support with planned meetings at a frequency of at least once a week 3. Sufficient proficiency in Swedish

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: A diagnosis of intellectual disability

Design outcomes

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Preliminary efficacy: 1. Quality of life measured using Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL-8D) and EQ-5D-5L at baseline, post-intervention, and 6 months after completion 2. Mental health measured using the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) at baseline, post-intervention, and 6 months after completion 3. Self-efficacy measured using the Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale at baseline, post-intervention, and 6 months after completion 4. Functioning measured using the Social and Self-Direction subscales of the Adaptive Behavior Assessment System (ABAS) at baseline, post-intervention, and 6 months after completion 5. Knowledge within the life domains covered by the Transition program measured using a knowledge test developed for this purpose at post-intervention	—

Measure

Time frame

Preliminary efficacy: 1. Quality of life measured using Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL-8D) and EQ-5D-5L at baseline, post-intervention, and 6 months after completion 2. Mental health measured using the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) at baseline, post-intervention, and 6 months after completion 3. Self-efficacy measured using the Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale at baseline, post-intervention, and 6 months after completion 4. Functioning measured using the Social and Self-Direction subscales of the Adaptive Behavior Assessment System (ABAS) at baseline, post-intervention, and 6 months after completion 5. Knowledge within the life domains covered by the Transition program measured using a knowledge test developed for this purpose at post-intervention

—

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Feasibility/acceptability: 1. Recruitment rate, intervention uptake, and retention is measured using information collected continuously over the course of the trial 2. Characteristics of the included and retained samples (e.g., diagnoses, age, gender, years of schooling) collected at baseline 3. Participant satisfaction and relevance measured using course evaluations after each of the seven educational sessions and post-intervention 4. Participation/involvement measured using the Patient Participation and Rehabilitation Questionnaire post-intervention 5. Negative effects measured using the Negative Effects Questionnaire post-intervention, one free text question included in the course evaluations administered after each session and post-intervention, and spontaneously reported events 6. Feasibility/acceptability overall based on in-depth interviews with participants (n=5) and staff (n=5) at post-intervention	—

Measure

Time frame

Feasibility/acceptability: 1. Recruitment rate, intervention uptake, and retention is measured using information collected continuously over the course of the trial 2. Characteristics of the included and retained samples (e.g., diagnoses, age, gender, years of schooling) collected at baseline 3. Participant satisfaction and relevance measured using course evaluations after each of the seven educational sessions and post-intervention 4. Participation/involvement measured using the Patient Participation and Rehabilitation Questionnaire post-intervention 5. Negative effects measured using the Negative Effects Questionnaire post-intervention, one free text question included in the course evaluations administered after each session and post-intervention, and spontaneously reported events 6. Feasibility/acceptability overall based on in-depth interviews with participants (n=5) and staff (n=5) at post-intervention

—

Countries

Sweden

Contacts

Public ContactUlf Jonsson

ulf.jonsson@ki.se+46 (0)73 806 43 37

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026