Kinesophobia in patients with knee osteoarthritis Musculoskeletal Diseases Knee osteoarthritis
Conditions
Interventions
Personal demographic data was recorded after the patient was admitted to the clinic with adequate resting time. Patients were asked to rate rest, activity, and night pain severity. The strength of the
Sponsors
Baskent University
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: 1. Willing to participate in study 2. Aged 40-80 years 3. Diagnosed with grade 2-3 osteoarthritis according to Kellgren-Lawrence scoring
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: 1. Other neurological and musculoskeletal diseases that affect balance and muscle strength 2. Prior knee surgery 3. Severe comorbidities 4. Pregnancy
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Kinesiophobia assessed using a transculturally adapted version of the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK), which was developed to measure the fear of movement/re-injury of patients. The 4-point Likert scale (from strongly disagree (score = 1) to strongly agree (score = 4)) is used on the scale. A high score (maximum 68) indicates that the patient’s fear of falls and movements is excessive. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| 1. Pain Intensity. Knee pain severity was measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) during activity and rest. The patients were asked to mark the pain levels they felt on a horizontal line of 100 mm. 0 indicated no pain and 100 indicated maximum pain, referring to intolerable pain. The point marked on the line was measured with a ruler, and the intensity of the pain felt by the persons was recorded in cm. 2. Quadriceps muscle strength measured using the Lafayette manual muscle testing system (Range: 0-300 lb [0-136.1 kg]). In order to measure the quadriceps muscle strength, the patient was asked to perform a knee extension against the dynamometer stabilized in the bed by placing perpendicularly on the tibia immediately above the malleoli, while the patient was in sitting position with the knees in a 90-degree flexion position. The value displayed in the digital dynamometer was recorded as the quadriceps muscle strength. 3. Hamstring muscle strength. While the patient was lying in the supine position, the dynamometer was placed just above the ankle joint, and the patient was asked to flex his leg. The value displayed in the digital dynamometer was recorded as the knee flexion muscle strength. 4. Range of Motion. The patient was placed in a supine position, and the normal joint motion range of the knee joint in the direction of flexion and extension was passively measured using a manual goniometer. 5. Balance assessed using the Berg Balance Scale (BBS). This test assesses the ability of individuals to maintain their balances while performing their functional activities. This balance test consists of 14 items, and each section is rated between “0”, the lowest level of function, and “4”, the highest level of function. It measures the level of dependence and/or independence when performing positions, such as standing up from a sitting position, standing with the feet together, standing in tandem stance a | — |
Countries
Turkey
Outcome results
None listed