Skip to content

Investigation of factors affecting fear of movement in patients with knee osteoarthritis

What are the factors associated with kinesiophobia in patients with knee osteoarthritis?

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN10989223
Enrollment
60
Registered
2018-05-13
Start date
2018-01-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-03-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Kinesophobia in patients with knee osteoarthritis Musculoskeletal Diseases Knee osteoarthritis

Interventions

Personal demographic data was recorded after the patient was admitted to the clinic with adequate resting time. Patients were asked to rate rest, activity, and night pain severity. The strength of the

Sponsors

Baskent University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Willing to participate in study 2. Aged 40-80 years 3. Diagnosed with grade 2-3 osteoarthritis according to Kellgren-Lawrence scoring

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Other neurological and musculoskeletal diseases that affect balance and muscle strength 2. Prior knee surgery 3. Severe comorbidities 4. Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Kinesiophobia assessed using a transculturally adapted version of the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK), which was developed to measure the fear of movement/re-injury of patients. The 4-point Likert scale (from strongly disagree (score = 1) to strongly agree (score = 4)) is used on the scale. A high score (maximum 68) indicates that the patient’s fear of falls and movements is excessive.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Pain Intensity. Knee pain severity was measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) during activity and rest. The patients were asked to mark the pain levels they felt on a horizontal line of 100 mm. 0 indicated no pain and 100 indicated maximum pain, referring to intolerable pain. The point marked on the line was measured with a ruler, and the intensity of the pain felt by the persons was recorded in cm. 2. Quadriceps muscle strength measured using the Lafayette manual muscle testing system (Range: 0-300 lb [0-136.1 kg]). In order to measure the quadriceps muscle strength, the patient was asked to perform a knee extension against the dynamometer stabilized in the bed by placing perpendicularly on the tibia immediately above the malleoli, while the patient was in sitting position with the knees in a 90-degree flexion position. The value displayed in the digital dynamometer was recorded as the quadriceps muscle strength. 3. Hamstring muscle strength. While the patient was lying in the supine position, the dynamometer was placed just above the ankle joint, and the patient was asked to flex his leg. The value displayed in the digital dynamometer was recorded as the knee flexion muscle strength. 4. Range of Motion. The patient was placed in a supine position, and the normal joint motion range of the knee joint in the direction of flexion and extension was passively measured using a manual goniometer. 5. Balance assessed using the Berg Balance Scale (BBS). This test assesses the ability of individuals to maintain their balances while performing their functional activities. This balance test consists of 14 items, and each section is rated between “0”, the lowest level of function, and “4”, the highest level of function. It measures the level of dependence and/or independence when performing positions, such as standing up from a sitting position, standing with the feet together, standing in tandem stance a

Countries

Turkey

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026