Skip to content

The Operative Rib Fixation (ORiF) study

A multicentre randomised controlled trial assessing the mortality, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness of operative rib fixation plus supportive management versus supportive management alone for patients with multiple rib fractures

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN10777575
Enrollment
524
Registered
2019-05-30
Start date
2019-04-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-03-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rib fractures Injury, Occupational Diseases, Poisoning Fracture of rib

Interventions

1:1 randomisation where patients will receive either: 1. Operative rib fixation plus supportive management (intervention) 2. Supportive management alone (control) Minimisation factors: age
polytrauma
mechanical ventilation and study site

Sponsors

Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients who present with multiple (three or more) rib fractures suitable for surgical repair and one or more of the following: 1. Clinical flail chest 2. Respiratory difficulty requiring respiratory support 3. Uncontrollable pain using standard modalities

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Aged under 16 years 2. Thoracic injury requiring emergent operative or interventional radiology 3. Cannot be operated on within 72 hours as deemed unfit for surgery Added 06/10/2021: 4. Unwilling or unable to comply with protocol follow up requirements 5. Any other significant disease or condition which, in the opinion of the local research team, may influence the results of the trial or the patient’s ability to participate in the trial

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Current primary outcome measure as of 11/12/2023: All-cause mortality at 12 months _____ Previous primary outcome measure: 1. All-cause mortality at 12 months 2. Quality of life measured using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire at baseline, 30 days, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Current secondary outcome measures as of 17/03/2023: 1. Quality of life measured using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire at baseline, 30 days, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months 2. Patient-reported pain and function measured using the pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and function-related patient questionnaire at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months 3. Need for further intervention assessed using patient medical records and Trauma Audit and Research Network (TARN) data, specifically: operative and supportive management details (until discharge), complications (over 12 months), further intervention (over 12 months), ventilator days (until discharge), CT imaging (at baseline) and x-ray imaging (at 6 – 8 weeks post-discharge for the operative group only) 4. Length of stay (LOS) until discharge, assessed using patient medical records and Trauma Audit & Research Network (TARN) data 5. Cost-effectiveness measured using a Health Resource Use questionnaire at 6 months and 12 months 6. Generalisability of the findings from the randomised trial against the population registry data over 12 months, using a recent statistical approach, using TARN data for both randomised and non-randomised patients Previous secondary outcome measures: 1. Patient-reported pain and function measured using the pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and function-related patient questionnaire at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months 2. Need for further intervention assessed using patient medical records and Trauma Audit and Research Network (TARN) data, specifically: operative and supportive management details (until discharge), complications (over 12 months), further intervention (over 12 months), ventilator days (until discharge), CT imaging (at baseline) and x-ray imaging (at 6 – 8 weeks post-discharge for the operative group only) 3. Length of stay (LOS) until discharge, assessed using patient medical records and Trauma Audit & Research Network (TARN) data 4. Cost-effectiveness measured using a Health Resource Use ques

Countries

England, Scotland, United Kingdom, Wales

Contacts

Public ContactNicholas Beale
orif@ndorms.ox.ac.uk+44 (0)1865 613756

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026