Skip to content

Can treatment with N-PEP-12 improve recovery after acute ischemic stroke?

Combined Neuropsychological, Neurophysiological and Psychophysiological Assessment of the Effects of N-Pep-12 on Neurorecovery in Patients after Ischemic Stroke

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN10702895
Enrollment
120
Registered
2019-02-19
Start date
2016-04-05
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-03-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Supratentorial, radiologically confirmed ischemic stroke with the onset 30-120 days prior to screening Circulatory System

Interventions

The synopsis of the study is organised in 3 visits: Visit 1 – Screening / Baseline Visit 2 – Efficacy / Safety - Day 30 Visit 3 – Efficacy / Safety - Day 90 No follow-up was performed after the 90

Sponsors

EN: The foundation for the study of neuroscience and neuroregeneration (RO: Fundatia pentru Studiul Nanoneurostiintelor si Neuroregenerarii)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Stroke onset – 30-120 days prior to screening 2. Stroke is ischemic in origin, supratentorial, and radiologically confirmed (CT or MRI) 3. No significant pre-stroke disability (pre-stroke Modified Rankin Score of 0 or 1) 4. Goodglass and Kaplan Communication Scale Score of > 2 at screening 5. No other stroke in the 3 months preceding index stroke 6. Age between 18 and 80 years, inclusive

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Pre-existing and active major neurological disease 2. Pre-existing and active (e.g., on chronic medication) major psychiatric disease, such as major depression, schizophrenia, bipolar disease, or dementia (the short Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE) score >3) 3. Advanced liver, kidney, cardiac, or pulmonary disease 4. A terminal medical diagnosis consistent with survival 3 11. Glaucoma

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. Cognitive function assessed using Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) (Nasreddine, 2005) at days 0, 30, 90 2. Emotional status assessed using Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (Zigmond, 1983) at days 0, 30, 90 3. Cognitive function assessed using Digit Span (Wechsler adult intelligence scale – third edition (Wechsler, 1997) at days 0, 30, 90 4. Cognitive function assessed using Color Trails Test (Posch, 2005) at days 0, 30, 90 5. Cognitive function assessed using PSI (Processing Speed Index, Wechsler adult intelligence scale – third edition) at days 0, 30, 90

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Current secondary outcome measures as of 02/04/2020: 1. Eye movements assessed using a Tobii Pro TX300 eye tracking device and analyzed using Tobii Studio software at days 0, 30, 90 2. Brain electrical activity assessed using electoencephalography (EEG) and analyzed quantitatively using BrainAnalyzer software at days 0, 30, 90 _____ Previous secondary outcome measures: 1. Eye movements assessed using a Tobii Pro TX300 eye tracking device and analyzed using Tobii Studio software at 30, 101 and 180 days 2. Brain electrical activity assessed using electoencephalography (EEG) and analyzed quantitatively using BrainAnalyzer software at 30, 101 and 180 days

Countries

Romania

Contacts

Public ContactStefan Strilciuc
stefan.strilciuc@ssnn.ro+40740066761

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 20, 2026