Skip to content

Effect of overdenture with vital and non-vital abutment teeth

Effect of overdenture with vital and non-vital abutment teeth on tooth stability

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN10675141
Enrollment
30
Registered
2015-09-15
Start date
2013-12-24
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2016-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Implant overdentures Oral Health

Interventions

The patients were randomly divided into two groups each of 15 patients, both treated with overdenture, but they were different in the abutment teeth, the first group received vital abutment teeth whil

Sponsors

Albaha University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Male

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Men age at least 59 years 2. Partially edentulous, and wearing their third lower denture 3. Have the same maxillomandiblar relationship class one 4. The patients with non-vital tooth had acute pulpitis treated by root canal treatment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with systemic diseases

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Attachment loss: The attachment loss was measured according to Romfjord (1967), the measurement of attachment loss from the gingival margin till the cementoenamel junction. The clinical attachment loss (CAL) is the measurement of the loss of the position of the soft tissue in relation to the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) that is a fixed point that does not change throughout life. The CAL is assessed by both the probing depth plus the gingival margin level. For instance, if the probing depth measurement 4 mm and gingival margin level 2 mm, the clinical attachment loss will be 6 mm. Measured at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after treatment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Tooth mobility: The measurement of tooth mobility was done according to Everett and Sten (1969) the measurement of tooth mobility baccolingual by two dental instruments (probe or mirror) and classified as first degree mobility 0 mm, second degree mobility 1 mm and third degree mobility more than 1 mm. The tooth mobility was assessed by using the ends of two dental instruments handles (probe or mirrors). The mobility was graded into class I, II, and III. Four implants were placed to attach a fixed bar, three clips were placed in the overdenture for retention. The overdentures root-supported have been fabricated to accurate periodontal and/or occlusal collapse. Some teeth are corrected to support and/or keep the prosthesis. Measured at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after treatment.

Countries

Saudi Arabia

Contacts

Public ContactWaled Ahmed

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026