Skip to content

Use of forum theatre in service design and patient decision aids

Use of forum theatre in service design and patient decision aids

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN10609390
Enrollment
64
Registered
2026-04-14
Start date
2026-03-13
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-04-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Decision-making in maternity care, specifically informed choice for birth planning (e.g. large-for-gestational-age pregnancies), and optimisation of healthcare service design using forum theatre Pregnancy and Childbirth

Interventions

This study evaluates a forum theatre informed co-production approach for designing maternity services that support patient decision-making compared with standard co-production without theatre input.

Sponsors

University of Birmingham
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 85 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Adults aged =18 years able to provide informed consent. Participants will include: 1. Maternity service users with previous experience of maternity care (not currently pregnant) 2. Clinicians (e.g. midwives, doctors, or other healthcare professionals with maternity experience) 3. Service managers or stakeholders involved in maternity service design Participants must be able to engage in group discussion in English

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Individuals unable to provide informed consent 2. Individuals currently pregnant 3. Individuals experiencing distress or vulnerability that would make participation inappropriate 4. Those unable to participate in group discussions

Design outcomes

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Quality of service design outputs, measured using structured evaluation criteria (including number of components and inclusion of key service elements), assessed within 3 to 6 months following the workshop sessions, after transcription and thematic analysis of recorded data 2. Participant experience and perceived usefulness of the process, measured using a structured post-session questionnaire with Likert-scale responses, collected immediately after participation 3. Argumentative structure and thematic variation in discussions, measured using automated text analysis (e.g., topic modelling, argument sophistication indices), conducted after transcription of recorded sessions

Countries

England, United Kingdom

Contacts

Public ContactSaba Tariq
s.tariq@bham.ac.uk+44 (0)7459525748

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: May 1, 2026