Skip to content

Comparing hands-on training and video tutorial to hands-on training alone in teaching IUD application to 5th year medical students

Comparing hands-on training and video tutorial to hands-on training alone in teaching IUD application to 5th year medical students: a single-center interventional study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN10448032
Enrollment
160
Registered
2015-04-23
Start date
2015-02-17
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-08-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Teaching of intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD) application to medical students at the University of Helsinki as a part of the general gynecology course. Not Applicable

Interventions

The study intervention is teaching the application of an IUD with the additional resource of a video tutorial, showing a live situation of IUD insertion. The study design is a case-control study. The

Sponsors

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Helsinki University Hospital and Helsinki University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. 5th year medical students performing their basic gynecological course during 2015. 2. The patients are recruited from primary-care units for the teaching session. They are women that desire an IUD as contraception or as treatment for menstrual irregularities or dysmenorrea. They are recruited in the study at the session.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Other than participants of the basic gynecology course. There are no exlusion criteria for the patients when it comes to parity or age.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The learning outcome is measured at the teaching session. The evaluation is done by an experienced teacher, the student and the patient with the help of structured questionnaires, including evaluation of the technical performance and questions on feelings of anxiety, communicative skills and pain. The results will be compared between the control and the intervention group.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The study has no secondary outcome measures.

Countries

Finland

Contacts

Public ContactSabrina Forsell

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026