Skip to content

The immediate implant-supported mandibular overdentures with cusped and cuspless tooth

The impact of immediate implant-supported mandibular overdentures with cusped and cuspless tooth on bone tissues

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN10121553
Enrollment
20
Registered
2015-09-07
Start date
2013-10-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-05-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

This study aimed to examine the impact of immediate implant-supported mandibular overdentures with cusped or cuspless tooth on surrounding bone tissues. Oral Health

Interventions

The randomization of selected patients was by lottery selection after giving each patient a number in a list, and then randomly the 20 patients were divided into two groups, 10 patients for each group

Sponsors

Albaha University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Aged over 40 years 2. Free from any systematic diseases 3. Non-smoker 4. Jaw relation angle class one 5. Refused removable partial dentures 6. Edentulous more than 3 years 7. Hopeless mandibular teeth

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Diabetes 2. Hypertension 3. Patients who prefer the removable partial dentures 4. Immunodeficient patients

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Crestal bone loss observed over one year, at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. The measurement of crestal bone loss by periapical radiographs was evaluated by the masial and distal marginal bone height around the abutments (implant) from the radiograph of each patient as follow; two points were marked one at apex of implant and anther at the tip of the implant, a line (A) was drown connecting the 2 points then the tangent (b) to the tip of tooth, marginal bone height was measured by a dial caliper from mesial and distal alveolar crest to line (b), and measurements on serial radiographs were compared and the results were statistically analyzed as mean and percent.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Periapical lesions measured in each cross-section from the widest and deepest part of the lesion by the researcher using a precision digital caliper with an accuracy of up to 0.01 mm, at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. 2. Pain measured using visual analog scale (VAS) at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months 3. Neural sensibility measured using a pulp sensibility test, which includes an electric test, which extrapolates pulp health from sensory response, at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months 4. Mobility of implants measured according to the periotest, siemens dental bensheim, Germany at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months.

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Public ContactHammdi Hakimi
yahio2000@yahoo.com+966 532 153553

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026