Skip to content

Building on Existing Tools to Improve Chronic Disease Prevention in Family Practice: The Better Project

The use of patient- and practice-level interventions to improve chronic disease prevention in family practice: A pragmatic randomised controlled trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN07170460
Enrollment
1120
Registered
2010-04-07
Start date
2010-07-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2017-02-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic disease prevention - specifically cancer, diabetes and cardiovascular diseases Not Applicable

Interventions

1. Patient-level intervention with a trained health care professional during which a plan will be developed for the patient. All recommendations and discussions will be based on the 'BETTER' preventio

Sponsors

Canadian Partnership Against Cancer (Canada)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Strata 1: 1.1. Adult patients of the participating Family Physicians who are between the ages of 40 and 65, inclusive 1.2. Written informed consent to participate in the trial 2. Strata 2: Adults with moderate mental illness aged 40 to 65

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients who are unable to give written informed consent for reasons of language, literacy or competence 2. Patients who are not able to come to the family practice office 3. Off-site patients or non-active patients (no visit in the last 3 years) of the family physician

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The Summary Quality Index (SQUID), measured at 6 months A reliable and valid composite measure to track quality of care among primary care practice patients that use an electronic medical record (EMR). The primary analysis will be a comparison between the SQUID of the intervention group and the SQUID of the control group.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Assessment of the impact of the intervention in improving the quality of care, comparison made from baseline to 6 months follow-up (intervention group only) 2. Economic evaluation to examine the cost-effectiveness of the interventions Outcomes will be measured at 12 months.

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 15, 2026