Skip to content

Biochemical Efficacy and Safety Trial of vitamin D (BEST-D)

Biochemical Efficacy and Safety Trial of vitamin D (BEST-D): a dose-finding trial assessing biochemical and vascular effects of high dose vitamin D

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN07034656
Enrollment
300
Registered
2012-04-12
Start date
2012-04-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2016-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Safety and efficacy of vitamin D Nutritional, Metabolic, Endocrine

Interventions

50µg of vitamin D3 or 100 µg of vitamin D3 or matching placebo Duration: 12 months of treatment

Sponsors

University of Oxford (UK)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Age = 65 years 2. Living in the community and ambulatory

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Nursing home residents 2. Regular use of vitamin D supplements with >400 IU (10 µg) vitamin D daily 3. Use of alendronate, risedronate, zoledronic acid, parathyroid hormone, or calcitonin 4. Medically diagnosed dementia 5. History of hypercalcaemia, hyperparathyroidism, lymphoma, sarcoidosis, active tuberculosis 6. History of renal calculus 7. Known to be poorly compliant with clinic visits or with taking medication 8. Recent history of alcohol or substance misuse or abuse 9. Medical history that might limit the ability of the subject to take the study treatment for the duration of the study (e.g. terminal illness) 10. Regular prescribed calcium supplements

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. The primary efficacy assessment will involve an ?intention-to-treat? analysis among all randomized subjects of daily dietary supplementation with vitamin D3 100 µg vs vitamin D3 50 µg on the proportion of individuals with levels of 25(OH)D above 90 nmol/L at the end of the study. 2. A co-primary endpoint will be the difference between those allocated 100 vs 50 µg daily in the mean 25(OH)D levels at the scheduled study end

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
All secondary assessments will involve ?intention-to-treat? analyses among all randomized subjects of the effects of daily supplementation with vitamin D3 100µg vs placebo, vitamin D3 50µg vs placebo, and the difference between the two doses of vitamin D on: 1. Mean blood levels of 25(OH)D during follow-up 2. The proportions of participants with blood 25(OH)D levels >90 nmol/L at the 6 and 12 month visits 3. The proportion of participants with PTH levels suppressed into the normal range at the 6 and 12 month visits 4. The proportion of participants with calcium levels above the normal range at the 6 and 12 month visits 5. Other laboratory tests of safety: phosphate, albumin, creatinine, alkaline phosphatase 6. The changes from baseline in hsCRP, creatinine, nBNP, inflammatory cytokines (e.g. IL5, IL6, IL1ß, IFN? and TNFa) at 6 and 12 month visits, and mRNA expression markers of innate immunity at baseline and 12 month visits 7. The difference in the change from baseline in diastolic and systolic blood pressure, heart rate and arterial stiffness at 6 and 12 months 8. The difference in the changes from baseline in total cholesterol, LDL-C, HDL-C, triglycerides, apo-B and apo-A at 12 months

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026